These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733099)

  • 1. Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa.
    Acton JH; Smith RT; Greenberg JP; Greenstein VC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22733099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the Usefulness of MP-3 Microperimetry in Glaucoma Patients.
    Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Hirasawa K; Yanagisawa M; Asaoka R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 187():1-9. PubMed ID: 29248331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Visual Fields in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa Using a Novel Microperimeter with Eye Tracking: The MP-3.
    Igarashi N; Matsuura M; Hashimoto Y; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Inoue T; Ryo O; Aihara M; Asaoka R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166666. PubMed ID: 27893769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects.
    Acton JH; Bartlett NS; Greenstein VC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Nov; 88(11):1288-97. PubMed ID: 21822159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The structure-function relationship measured with optical coherence tomography and a microperimeter with auto-tracking: the MP-3, in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
    Asahina Y; Kitano M; Hashimoto Y; Yanagisawa M; Murata H; Inoue T; Obata R; Asaoka R
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15766. PubMed ID: 29150681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
    Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
    Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Drance SM; Gaasterland D; Mills RP; Ashburn F; Hnik P; Van Coevorden RE
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H; Nakao F; Hayashi F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 132(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11438052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison among Humphrey field analyzer, Microperimetry, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the evaluation of macula in primary open angle glaucoma.
    Oztürk F; Yavas GF; Küsbeci T; Ermis SS
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 18344757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
    Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
    Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal study of visual field changes determined by Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 in patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa.
    Sayo A; Ueno S; Kominami T; Nishida K; Inooka D; Nakanishi A; Yasuda S; Okado S; Takahashi K; Matsui S; Terasaki H
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16383. PubMed ID: 29180701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kogure S; Toda Y; Tsukahara S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 16488960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of the Visual Field Loss in Retinitis Pigmentosa Using Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry.
    Nowomiejska K; Brzozowska A; Koss MJ; Weleber RG; Schiefer U; Rejdak K; Juenemann AG; Maciejewski R; Rejdak R
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 26470834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of visual field tests in glaucoma patients with a central visual field defect.
    Shin HY; Park HL; Park CK
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 54(4):489-494. PubMed ID: 31358149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter-device comparison of retinal sensitivity measurements: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-1.
    Wong EN; Mackey DA; Morgan WH; Chen FK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26285157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH; Wu JN; Chen JT; Lu DW
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H; Klistorner A; Graham S; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Klistorner A; Billson FA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variations in optic nerve head morphology by intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma.
    Wong A; Matheos K; Prime Z; Danesh-Meyer HV
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 255(11):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 28875349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Visual Field Progression Rates Among the High Tension Glaucoma, Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma, and Normal Tension Glaucoma.
    Ballae Ganeshrao S; Senthil S; Choudhari N; Sri Durgam S; Garudadri CS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Mar; 60(4):889-900. PubMed ID: 30835290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.