These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733227)

  • 1. A comparison of two estimation algorithms for Samejima's continuous IRT model.
    Zopluoglu C
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 22733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models.
    Wang C; Xu G; Zhang X
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):673-700. PubMed ID: 31183670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HBMIRT: A SAS macro for estimating uni- and multidimensional 1- and 2-parameter item response models in small (and large!) samples.
    Wagner W; Zitzmann S; Hecht M
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):4130-4161. PubMed ID: 38519726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DIF Cancellation in the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 23816591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Study of Rasch, partial credit, and rating scale model parameter recovery in WINSTEPS and jMetrik.
    Meyer JP; Hailey E
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 23234828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment.
    Fayers PM
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():187-94. PubMed ID: 17417722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Note on Improving Variational Estimation for Multidimensional Item Response Theory.
    Ma C; Ouyang J; Wang C; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; 89(1):172-204. PubMed ID: 37979074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on the expected value of the Rand index.
    Steinley D; Brusco MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):287-299. PubMed ID: 29159803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision.
    Wang S; Fellouris G; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):375-394. PubMed ID: 30805879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.
    Ma W; Guo W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):370-392. PubMed ID: 30756389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Theoretical and Empirical Comparisons between Two Models for Continuous Item Response.
    Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Oct; 37(4):521-42. PubMed ID: 26816326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using EM Algorithm for Finite Mixtures and Reformed Supplemented EM for MIRT Calibration.
    Chen P; Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):299-326. PubMed ID: 33591556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Finite Mixture Item Response Theory Model for Continuous Measurement Outcomes.
    Zopluoglu C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Apr; 80(2):346-364. PubMed ID: 32158025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Global convergence of the EM algorithm for unconstrained latent variable models with categorical indicators.
    Weissman A
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):134-53. PubMed ID: 25107522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The UMP Exact Test and the Confidence Interval for Person Parameters in IRT Models.
    Liu X; Han Z; Johnson MS
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):182-202. PubMed ID: 28836133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginalized maximum a posteriori estimation for the four-parameter logistic model under a mixture modelling framework.
    Meng X; Xu G; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():51-82. PubMed ID: 31552688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.