These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733681)

  • 1. An analysis of electronic document management in oncology care.
    Poulter T; Gannon B; Bath PA
    Health Informatics J; 2012 Jun; 18(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 22733681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use and usability of EPR systems in oncology.
    Poulter T; Bath PA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():398-402. PubMed ID: 22874220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CICERO: an emergent conceptual model for onco-EPR systems.
    Poulter TW; Bath PA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1131. PubMed ID: 23920905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What can nurse leaders and staff nurses do to prepare to implement electronic care records?
    Moore R; Jones M
    Nurs Times; 2010 Apr 6-12; 106(13):10-2. PubMed ID: 20441107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical areas of national electronic health record programs-is our focus correct?
    Deutsch E; Duftschmid G; Dorda W
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Mar; 79(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 20079685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation, monitoring and utilization of an integrated Hospital Information System--lessons from a case study.
    Cruz-Correia RJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):238-41. PubMed ID: 20841685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On a mission to eradicate paper. Implementing a document management system paves the way for electronic medical records.
    Health Manag Technol; 2011 Mar; 32(3):16-7. PubMed ID: 21739807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the impact of electronic care records on confidentiality and nursing practice.
    Moore R; Stonham G
    Nurs Times; 2010 Apr 13-19; 106(14):16-8. PubMed ID: 20446631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of user adoption during three module deployments of region-wide electronic patient record systems.
    Janols R; Lind T; Göransson B; Sandblad B
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jun; 83(6):438-49. PubMed ID: 24630924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodology of integration of a clinical data warehouse with a clinical information system: the HEGP case.
    Zapletal E; Rodon N; Grabar N; Degoulet P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):193-7. PubMed ID: 20841676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task analysis and interoperable application services for service event management.
    Mykkänen J; Virkanen H; Kortekangas P; Savolainen S; Itälä T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():295-9. PubMed ID: 21893760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Good timing.
    Lacey P
    Health Serv J; 1992 Aug; 102(5315):26-7. PubMed ID: 10121390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of electronic patient record systems in primary healthcare in a Finnish county.
    Mäkelä K; Virjo I; Aho J; Kalliola P; Kurunmäki H; Uusitalo L; Valli M; Ylinen S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Dec; 16(10):1017-23. PubMed ID: 21058891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness.
    Tjora AH; Scambler G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 19054601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategies to accelerate translation of research into primary care within practices using electronic medical records.
    Nemeth LS; Wessell AM; Jenkins RG; Nietert PJ; Liszka HA; Ornstein SM
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2007; 22(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 17873732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitness for purpose when there are many different purposes: who are electronic patient records for?
    Eason K; Waterson P
    Health Informatics J; 2014 Sep; 20(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 24282190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative case study investigating sociotechnical processes of change in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
    Cresswell KM; Worth A; Sheikh A
    Health Informatics J; 2012 Dec; 18(4):251-70. PubMed ID: 23257056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A case study evaluation of a Critical Care Information System adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach.
    Yusof MM
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jul; 84(7):486-99. PubMed ID: 25881560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benchmarking electronic medical record adoption.
    McCartney PR
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(6):358. PubMed ID: 20975396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study.
    Hendy J; Reeves BC; Fulop N; Hutchings A; Masseria C
    BMJ; 2005 Aug; 331(7512):331-6. PubMed ID: 16081447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.