These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733687)

  • 1. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (II): sample size re-estimation.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2041-54. PubMed ID: 22733687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing the sample size during clinical trials with t-distributed test statistics without inflating the type I error rate.
    Timmesfeld N; Schäfer H; Müller HH
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2449-64. PubMed ID: 17080491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical testing of multiple endpoints in group-sequential trials.
    Glimm E; Maurer W; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 19827011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size re-estimation for adaptive sequential design in clinical trials.
    Gao P; Ware JH; Mehta C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1184-96. PubMed ID: 18991116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
    Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: a practical guide with examples.
    Mehta CR; Pocock SJ
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3267-84. PubMed ID: 22105690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved two-stage group sequential procedures for testing a secondary endpoint after the primary endpoint achieves significance.
    Li H; Wang J; Luo X; Grechko J; Jennison C
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):893-902. PubMed ID: 29876964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the efficiency of estimation in randomized trials of adaptive treatment strategies.
    Lavori PW; Dawson R
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 17848491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase II cancer clinical trials with a one-sample log-rank test and its corrections based on the Edgeworth expansion.
    Sun X; Peng P; Tu D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 20888929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical considerations for testing multiple endpoints in group sequential or adaptive clinical trials.
    Hung HM; Wang SJ; O'Neill R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1201-10. PubMed ID: 18027226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on familywise error rate for a primary and secondary endpoint.
    Proschan MA; Follmann DA
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1114-1118. PubMed ID: 35355244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design of adaptive two-stage double-arm clinical trials for dichotomous variables.
    Jiang Z; Xue F; Li C; Wang L; Cai H; Zhang C; Xia J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 20172053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size re-estimation for survival data in clinical trials with an adaptive design.
    Togo K; Iwasaki M
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 22328325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extension of adaptive alpha allocation methods for strong control of the family-wise error rate.
    Li H; Sankoh AJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(2):181-95. PubMed ID: 22806685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination in superiority clinical trials with multiple co-primary correlated endpoints.
    Sozu T; Sugimoto T; Hamasaki T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):650-68. PubMed ID: 21516562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.