These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733892)

  • 1. Detection of hepatic steatosis on contrast-enhanced CT images: diagnostic accuracy of identification of areas of presumed focal fatty sparing.
    Lawrence DA; Oliva IB; Israel GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22733892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liver Steatosis Categorization on Contrast-Enhanced CT Using a Fully Automated Deep Learning Volumetric Segmentation Tool: Evaluation in 1204 Healthy Adults Using Unenhanced CT as a Reference Standard.
    Pickhardt PJ; Blake GM; Graffy PM; Sandfort V; Elton DC; Perez AA; Summers RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):359-367. PubMed ID: 32936018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biopsy-proven nonsteatotic liver in adults: estimation of reference range for difference in attenuation between the liver and the spleen at nonenhanced CT.
    Park YS; Park SH; Lee SS; Kim DY; Shin YM; Lee W; Lee SG; Yu ES
    Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):760-6. PubMed ID: 21212369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hepatic steatosis (fatty liver disease) in asymptomatic adults identified by unenhanced low-dose CT.
    Boyce CJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Bruce RJ; Lindstrom MJ; Hinshaw JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):623-8. PubMed ID: 20173137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of Moderate Hepatic Steatosis on Portal Venous Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT: Evaluation Using an Automated Artificial Intelligence Tool.
    Pickhardt PJ; Blake GM; Kimmel Y; Weinstock E; Shaanan K; Hassid S; Abbas A; Fox MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):748-758. PubMed ID: 37466185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic criteria for fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast-enhanced helical CT.
    Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Shapiro MA; Langlotz CP; Slosman F; Rubesin SE; Horii SC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):659-64. PubMed ID: 9725292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Material density hepatic steatosis quantification on intravenous contrast-enhanced rapid kilovolt (peak)-switching single-source dual-energy computed tomography.
    Patel BN; Kumbla RA; Berland LL; Fineberg NS; Morgan DE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):904-10. PubMed ID: 24270112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Qualitative assessment of liver for fatty infiltration on contrast-enhanced CT: is muscle a better standard of reference than spleen?
    Panicek DM; Giess CS; Schwartz LH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 9294555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-energy non-contrast hepatic steatosis criteria applied to virtual non-contrast images: is it still highly specific and positively predictive?
    Haji-Momenian S; Parkinson W; Khati N; Brindle K; Earls J; Zeman RK
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):594.e7-594.e15. PubMed ID: 29526439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of CT methods for determining graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation.
    Şeker M; Erol C; Sevmiş Ş; Saka B; Durur Karakaya A
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 30937504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of fatty liver: prospective study with same-day biopsy used as the reference standard.
    Kim DY; Park SH; Lee SS; Kim HJ; Kim SY; Kim MY; Lee Y; Kim TK; Khalili K; Bae MH; Lee JY; Lee SG; Yu ES
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 19727755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-contrast CT liver attenuation alone is superior to the liver-spleen difference for identifying moderate hepatic steatosis.
    Pickhardt PJ; Blake GM; Moeller A; Garrett JW; Summers RM
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Nov; 34(11):7041-7052. PubMed ID: 38834787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of correlations between lipid profile and different computed tomography fatty liver criteria in the setting of incidentally noted fatty liver on computed tomography examinations.
    Jawahar A; Gonzalez B; Balasubramanian N; Adams W; Goldberg A
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Dec; 29(12):1389-1396. PubMed ID: 28957871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of viable tumor in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: usefulness of attenuation value measurement at quadruple-phase helical computed tomography.
    Kim SH; Lee WJ; Lim HK; Lim JH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 17414753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilizing fully-automated 3D organ segmentation for hepatic steatosis assessment with CT attenuation-based parameters.
    Yoo J; Joo I; Jeon SK; Park J; Yoon SH
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Sep; 34(9):6205-6213. PubMed ID: 38393403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal Changes in Liver Fat Content in Asymptomatic Adults: Hepatic Attenuation on Unenhanced CT as an Imaging Biomarker for Steatosis.
    Hahn L; Reeder SB; Muñoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 26587921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unenhanced CT for assessment of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: comparison of visual grading with liver attenuation index.
    Lee SW; Park SH; Kim KW; Choi EK; Shin YM; Kim PN; Lee KH; Yu ES; Hwang S; Lee SG
    Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 17641368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: use of CT for quantitative and qualitative assessment.
    Park SH; Kim PN; Kim KW; Lee SW; Yoon SE; Park SW; Ha HK; Lee MG; Hwang S; Lee SG; Yu ES; Cho EY
    Radiology; 2006 Apr; 239(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 16484355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of CT methods for determining the fat content of the liver.
    Kodama Y; Ng CS; Wu TT; Ayers GD; Curley SA; Abdalla EK; Vauthey JN; Charnsangavej C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1307-12. PubMed ID: 17449775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Focal sparing of segment IV in fatty livers shown by sonography and CT: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage.
    Matsui O; Kadoya M; Takahashi S; Yoshikawa J; Gabata T; Takashima T; Kitagawa K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1137-40. PubMed ID: 7717220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.