BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733933)

  • 21. The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT.
    Paul NS; Blobel J; Prezelj E; Burey P; Ursani A; Menezes RJ; Kashani H; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1363-80. PubMed ID: 20145292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation.
    Hohl C; Suess C; Wildberger JE; Honnef D; Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Schaller A; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 18227544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
    Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chest CT performed with 3D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique: breast and effective doses.
    Matsubara K; Takata T; Koshida K; Noto K; Shimono T; Horii J; Yamamoto T; Matsui O
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 19268857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
    Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Schindera ST; Graca P; Patak MA; Abderhalden S; von Allmen G; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience.
    Prakash P; Kalra MK; Digumarthy SR; Hsieh J; Pien H; Singh S; Gilman MD; Shepard JA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jan; 34(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20118720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation dose estimation for prospective and retrospective ECG-gated cardiac CT angiography in infants and small children using a 320-MDCT volume scanner.
    Podberesky DJ; Angel E; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Salisbury SR; Alsip C; Barelli A; Egelhoff JC; Anderson-Evans C; Nguyen GB; Dow D; Frush DP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1129-35. PubMed ID: 23096189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Toth TL; Nguyen GT; Toncheva GI; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi TT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):W100-5. PubMed ID: 18212190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct quantification of breast dose during coronary CT angiography and evaluation of dose reduction strategies.
    Abadi S; Mehrez H; Ursani A; Parker M; Paul N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W152-8. PubMed ID: 21257856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Organ dose evaluation for multi-slice spiral CT scans based on China Sichuan chest anthropomorphic phantom measurements.
    Peng G; Zeng Y; Luo T; Zhao F; Peng S; You R; Tan H; Liu X; Wang J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 22039271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of in-plane shields during thoracic CT.
    Foley SJ; McEntee MF; Rainford LA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 23460031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation.
    Campbell J; Kalra MK; Rizzo S; Maher MM; Shepard JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1525-30. PubMed ID: 16304007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study.
    Moore WH; Bonvento M; Olivieri-Fitt R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W498-502. PubMed ID: 17056880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols.
    Ho LM; Yoshizumi TT; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC; Marin D; Toncheva G; Schindera ST
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1400-7. PubMed ID: 19596594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study.
    Feuchtner GM; Jodocy D; Klauser A; Haberfellner B; Aglan I; Spoeck A; Hiehs S; Soegner P; Jaschke W
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 19671491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.