172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22733946)
1. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement.
Baker PN; Petheram T; Jameson SS; Avery PJ; Reed MR; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):919-27. PubMed ID: 22733946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Deehan DJ; Lees D; Jameson S; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1058-66. PubMed ID: 22844046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of 38,716 total and unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis of linked data from the National Joint Registry of England, Northern Ireland and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme.
Mohammad HR; Judge A; Murray DW
Acta Orthop; 2021 Dec; 92(6):701-708. PubMed ID: 34309481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The association between body mass index and the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty.
Baker P; Petheram T; Jameson S; Reed M; Gregg P; Deehan D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(16):1501-8. PubMed ID: 22992819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data.
Goodfellow JW; O'Connor JJ; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Dec; 92(12):1628-31. PubMed ID: 21119165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry.
Pearse AJ; Hooper GJ; Rothwell A; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20357326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.
Hamilton D; Henderson GR; Gaston P; MacDonald D; Howie C; Simpson AH
Postgrad Med J; 2012 Nov; 88(1045):627-31. PubMed ID: 22822221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction.
Clement ND; MacDonald D; Burnett R; Breusch SJ
Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 23993274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.
Gummaraju A; Maillot C; Baryeh K; Villet L; Rivière C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102867. PubMed ID: 33639287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement.
Chou DT; Swamy GN; Lewis JR; Badhe NP
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 21636281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Relative effect per patient (REPP)--outcome groups for total hip replacement and total knee replacement].
Huber J; Dabis E; Zumstein MD; Hüsler J
Z Orthop Unfall; 2013 Jun; 151(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 23696160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee replacements.
Williams DP; Price AJ; Beard DJ; Hadfield SG; Arden NK; Murray DW; Field RE
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 23307671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan.
Jonas SC; Jermin P; Howells N; Porteous A; Murray J; Robinson J
Knee; 2019 Mar; 26(2):400-404. PubMed ID: 30792107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are current thrombo-embolic prophylaxis guidelines applicable to unicompartmental knee replacement?
Willis-Owen CA; Sarraf KM; Martin AE; Martin DK
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Dec; 93(12):1617-20. PubMed ID: 22161923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: A cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Baker PN; Rushton S; Jameson SS; Reed M; Gregg P; Deehan DJ
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1359-65. PubMed ID: 24078532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Rothwell AG; Hooper GJ; Hobbs A; Frampton CM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 20190314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study.
Saldanha KA; Keys GW; Svard UC; White SH; Rao C
Knee; 2007 Aug; 14(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 17524650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life: a national comparison of surgical treatment for focal (one- to two-level) lumbar spinal stenosis compared with total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.
Rampersaud YR; Wai EK; Fisher CG; Yee AJ; Dvorak MF; Finkelstein JA; Gandhi R; Abraham EP; Lewis SJ; Alexander DI; Oxner WM; Davey JR; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 22122836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee.
Scott CE; Bugler KE; Clement ND; MacDonald D; Howie CR; Biant LC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):974-81. PubMed ID: 22733956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating change using patient-reported outcome measures in knee replacement: the complementary nature of the EQ-5D index and VAS scores.
Lin FJ; Samp J; Munoz A; Wong PS; Pickard AS
Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Jun; 15(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 23765331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
