176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22735696)
1. SVM²: an improved paired-end-based tool for the detection of small genomic structural variations using high-throughput single-genome resequencing data.
Chiara M; Pesole G; Horner DS
Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Oct; 40(18):e145. PubMed ID: 22735696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying structural variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq.
Barrick JE; Colburn G; Deatherage DE; Traverse CC; Strand MD; Borges JJ; Knoester DB; Reba A; Meyer AG
BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):1039. PubMed ID: 25432719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of structural variants involving repetitive regions in the reference genome.
Lee H; Popodi E; Foster PL; Tang H
J Comput Biol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):219-33. PubMed ID: 24552580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toolkit for automated and rapid discovery of structural variants.
Soylev A; Kockan C; Hormozdiari F; Alkan C
Methods; 2017 Oct; 129():3-7. PubMed ID: 28583483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust and exact structural variation detection with paired-end and soft-clipped alignments: SoftSV compared with eight algorithms.
Bartenhagen C; Dugas M
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Jan; 17(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 25998133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting genomic deletions from high-throughput sequence data with unsupervised learning.
Li X; Wu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 23(Suppl 8):568. PubMed ID: 36707775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PRISM: pair-read informed split-read mapping for base-pair level detection of insertion, deletion and structural variants.
Jiang Y; Wang Y; Brudno M
Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 28(20):2576-83. PubMed ID: 22851530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SVmine improves structural variation detection by integrative mining of predictions from multiple algorithms.
Xia Y; Liu Y; Deng M; Xi R
Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 33(21):3348-3354. PubMed ID: 29036467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Global assessment of genomic variation in cattle by genome resequencing and high-throughput genotyping.
Zhan B; Fadista J; Thomsen B; Hedegaard J; Panitz F; Bendixen C
BMC Genomics; 2011 Nov; 12():557. PubMed ID: 22082336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SVEngine: an efficient and versatile simulator of genome structural variations with features of cancer clonal evolution.
Xia LC; Ai D; Lee H; Andor N; Li C; Zhang NR; Ji HP
Gigascience; 2018 Jul; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29982625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Seeksv: an accurate tool for somatic structural variation and virus integration detection.
Liang Y; Qiu K; Liao B; Zhu W; Huang X; Li L; Chen X; Li K
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 27634948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ulysses: accurate detection of low-frequency structural variations in large insert-size sequencing libraries.
Gillet-Markowska A; Richard H; Fischer G; Lafontaine I
Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 25380961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SV-Bay: structural variant detection in cancer genomes using a Bayesian approach with correction for GC-content and read mappability.
Iakovishina D; Janoueix-Lerosey I; Barillot E; Regnier M; Boeva V
Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):984-92. PubMed ID: 26740523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis.
Rausch T; Zichner T; Schlattl A; Stütz AM; Benes V; Korbel JO
Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):i333-i339. PubMed ID: 22962449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dysgu: efficient structural variant calling using short or long reads.
Cleal K; Baird DM
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 May; 50(9):e53. PubMed ID: 35100420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precise characterization of somatic complex structural variations from tumor/control paired long-read sequencing data with nanomonsv.
Shiraishi Y; Koya J; Chiba K; Okada A; Arai Y; Saito Y; Shibata T; Kataoka K
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Aug; 51(14):e74. PubMed ID: 37336583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BIMA V3: an aligner customized for mate pair library sequencing.
Drucker TM; Johnson SH; Murphy SJ; Cradic KW; Therneau TM; Vasmatzis G
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(11):1627-9. PubMed ID: 24526710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurate estimation of short read mapping quality for next-generation genome sequencing.
Ruffalo M; Koyutürk M; Ray S; LaFramboise T
Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):i349-i355. PubMed ID: 22962451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome-towards a human reference diploid genome.
English AC; Salerno WJ; Hampton OA; Gonzaga-Jauregui C; Ambreth S; Ritter DI; Beck CR; Davis CF; Dahdouli M; Ma S; Carroll A; Veeraraghavan N; Bruestle J; Drees B; Hastie A; Lam ET; White S; Mishra P; Wang M; Han Y; Zhang F; Stankiewicz P; Wheeler DA; Reid JG; Muzny DM; Rogers J; Sabo A; Worley KC; Lupski JR; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):286. PubMed ID: 25886820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated filtering of genome-wide large deletions through an ensemble deep learning framework.
Hu Y; Mangal S; Zhang L; Zhou X
Methods; 2022 Oct; 206():77-86. PubMed ID: 36038049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
