These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22735731)

  • 1. Evaluation of connected health technology.
    O'Neill SA; Nugent CD; Donnelly MP; McCullagh P; McLaughlin J
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(3):151-67. PubMed ID: 22735731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wireless body area networks for healthcare: the MobiHealth project.
    van Halteren A; Bults R; Wac K; Dokovsky N; Koprinkov G; Widya I; Konstantas D; Jones V; Herzog R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 108():181-93. PubMed ID: 15718645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.
    Bowen JM; Patterson LL; O'Reilly D; Hopkins RB; Blackhouse G; Burke N; Xie F; Tarride JE; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 19394573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health technology assessment from a Canadian device industry perspective.
    Ferrusi IL; Ames D; Lim ME; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 19394576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using health technology assessment to support evidence-based decision-making in Canada: an academic perspective.
    Xie F; Bowen JM; Sutherland SC; Burke N; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; O'Reilly D; Goeree R
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Oct; 11(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 21958096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context-aware infrastructure for personalized healthcare.
    Zhang D; Yu Z; Chin CY
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 117():154-63. PubMed ID: 16282665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1125-9. PubMed ID: 18954812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Home informatics in healthcare: assessment guidelines to keep up quality of care and avoid adverse effects.
    Roback K; Herzog A
    Technol Health Care; 2003; 11(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 12775936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
    Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trials of cost effectiveness in technology evaluation.
    Valk PE
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 10967629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations.
    Laupacis A; Feeny D; Detsky AS; Tugwell PX
    CMAJ; 1992 Feb; 146(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 1306034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An introduction to statistical methods for health technology assessment.
    White SJ; Ashby D; Brown PJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(8):i-iv, 1-59. PubMed ID: 10944742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].
    Schumacher I; Zechmeister I
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Apr; 74(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 21267815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health technology assessment for radiologists: basic principles and evaluation framework.
    Lim ME; O'Reilly D; Tarride JE; Burke N; Ferrusi IL; Campbell K; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 19394570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
    Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact centers, pervasive computing and telemedicine: a quality health care triangle.
    Maglaveras N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 108():149-54. PubMed ID: 15718641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technology assessment methods for radiology systems.
    Langlotz CP; Seshadri S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 May; 34(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 8657877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ending the technology paradox: healthcare management technologies for clinical decision making.
    Karys A
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(3):25-32. PubMed ID: 10338784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Untangling home care's Gordion knot. The Home Care Information Management and Technology Forum.
    Wilhelm L
    Caring; 2003 Mar; 22(3):18-22. PubMed ID: 12690814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.