512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22735788)
1. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Frumovitz M
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S21-4. PubMed ID: 18486966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Reynisson P; Persson J
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 23603368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.
Zakashansky K; Bradley WH; Chuang L; Rahaman J; Dottino P
Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Dec; 76(6):567-76. PubMed ID: 20014423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22617585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Salicrú S; Gil-Moreno A; Montero A; Roure M; Pérez-Benavente A; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):555-68. PubMed ID: 21783432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic radical hysterectomy.
Fanning J; Fenton B; Purohit M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):649.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18538146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications.
Smorgick N; DeLancey J; Patzkowsky K; Advincula A; Song A; As-Sanie S
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 22914467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era.
Kim JH; Kim K; Park SJ; Lee JY; Kim K; Lim MC; Kim JW
Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 51(2):788-796. PubMed ID: 30205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
