158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22736193)
41. Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients.
Maxfield MW; Schuster KM; McGillicuddy EA; Young CJ; Ghita M; Bokhari SA; Oliva IB; Brink JA; Davis KA
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Dec; 73(6):1406-11. PubMed ID: 23147183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Patient characteristics associated with differences in radiation exposure from pediatric abdomen-pelvis CT scans: a quantile regression analysis.
Cooper JN; Lodwick DL; Adler B; Lee C; Minneci PC; Deans KJ
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jun; 85():7-12. PubMed ID: 28412573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A survey of pediatric CT doses in the Shanghai metropolitan area.
Lu H; Wang W; Li B; Sun S; Zhang H
J Radiol Prot; 2019 Mar; 39(1):193-207. PubMed ID: 30560805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Delayed imaging in routine CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis: is it worth the additional cost of radiation and time?
Chan MG; Cassidy FH; Andre MP; Chu P; Aganovic L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 24450673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients.
Cody DD; Moxley DM; Krugh KT; O'Daniel JC; Wagner LK; Eftekhari F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15039151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):836-40. PubMed ID: 11560832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Influence of z overscanning on normalized effective doses calculated for pediatric patients undergoing multidetector CT examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Karantanas A; Karabekios S; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17500447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [A long-term follow-up report of pediatric relapsed Wilms tumor after retreatment].
Wang TY; Pan C; Gao YJ; Hu WT; Ye QD; Zhou M; Tang JY
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 55(10):743-747. PubMed ID: 29050111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Pelvic computed tomography scans for surveillance in patients with primary melanoma in the head and neck.
Alvarado GC; Papadopoulos NE; Hwu WJ; Bedikian AY; Homsi J; Myers JN; Bronstein Y; Bassett RL; Hwu P; Kim KB
Melanoma Res; 2011 Apr; 21(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 21169870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A comprehensive method for calculating patient effective dose and other dosimetric quantities from CT DICOM images.
Tsalafoutas IA; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22733904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Correlation analysis of organ doses determined by Monte Carlo simulation with dose metrics for patients undergoing chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Goto T; Obara S; Ota H; Tsukagoshi S
Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():1-9. PubMed ID: 32755745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.
Thomas KE; Wang B
Pediatr Radiol; 2008 Jun; 38(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 18392817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia.
Aldrich JE; Bilawich AM; Mayo JR
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2006 Apr; 57(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16944681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Radiation from CT scans in paediatric trauma patients: Indications, effective dose, and impact on surgical decisions.
Livingston MH; Igric A; Vogt K; Parry N; Merritt NH
Injury; 2014 Jan; 45(1):164-9. PubMed ID: 23845570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Impact of patient centering in CT on organ dose and the effect of using a positioning compensation system: Evidence from OSLD measurements in postmortem subjects.
Barreto I; Lamoureux R; Olguin C; Quails N; Correa N; Rill L; Arreola M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):141-151. PubMed ID: 31050136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prospective double-blinded study of abdominal-pelvic computed tomography guided by the region of tenderness: estimation of detection of acute pathology and radiation exposure reduction.
Broder JS; Hollingsworth CL; Miller CM; Meyer JL; Paulson EK
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Aug; 56(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 20074835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Conversion from dose length product to effective dose for the CT component of whole-body PET/CT.
Inoue Y; Ohkubo Y; Nagahara K; Uehara A; Takano M
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Apr; 36(4):411-419. PubMed ID: 35072916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.
McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon CH; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4262-4275. PubMed ID: 28477342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The relationship of body mass index and abdominal fat on the radiation dose received during routine computed tomographic imaging of the abdomen and pelvis.
Chan VO; McDermott S; Buckley O; Allen S; Casey M; O'Laoide R; Torreggiani WC
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 22136968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
