80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22736310)
1. Practical considerations for reporting surface dose in external beam radiotherapy: a 6 MV X-ray beam study.
Kim JH; Hill R; Kuncic Z
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Sep; 35(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 22736310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of modern dosimetry techniques near low- and high-density heterogeneities.
Alhakeem EA; AlShaikh S; Rosenfeld AB; Zavgorodni SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):142–158. PubMed ID: 26699322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy.
Ding W; Johnston PN; Wong TP; Bubb IF
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):39-48. PubMed ID: 15462585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total skin electron therapy treatment verification: Monte Carlo simulation and beam characteristics of large non-standard electron fields.
Pavón EC; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Capote R; Lagares JI; Perucha M; Arráns R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2783-96. PubMed ID: 14516101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte Carlo model for calculating out-of-field dose from a varian 6 MV beam.
Kry SF; Titt U; Pönisch F; Followill D; Vassiliev ON; White RA; Mohan R; Salehpour M
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4405-13. PubMed ID: 17153419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface and build-up region dosimetry for obliquely incident intensity modulated radiotherapy 6 MV x rays.
Dogan N; Glasgow GP
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3091-6. PubMed ID: 14713075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo simulation of a medical linear accelerator for radiotherapy use.
Serrano B; Hachem A; Franchisseur E; Hérault J; Marcié S; Costa A; Bensadoun RJ; Barthe J; Gérard JP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16644964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose build-up behind air cavities for Co-60, 4, 6 and 8 MV. Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Behrens CF
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5937-50. PubMed ID: 17068375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
