These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22736423)

  • 1. The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1189-99. PubMed ID: 22736423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R; White CN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1137-51. PubMed ID: 22545609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.
    Criss AH; Wheeler ME; McClelland JL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 23092213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    J Mem Lang; 2010 Jul; 63(1):18-34. PubMed ID: 20582147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioural pattern separation is strongly associated with familiarity-based decisions.
    Szőllősi Á; Bencze D; Racsmány M
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 31955670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Starns JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):742-54. PubMed ID: 24523046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using response time modeling to distinguish memory and decision processes in recognition and source tasks.
    Starns JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1357-72. PubMed ID: 25102773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of activation level between true and false items in the DRM paradigm.
    Senese VP; Sergi I; Iachini T
    Cogn Process; 2010 Aug; 11(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 19609786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. List-strength effects in older adults in recognition and free recall.
    Sahakyan L
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):764-778. PubMed ID: 30607754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection.
    Papesh MH; Hicks JL; Guevara Pinto JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2328-2341. PubMed ID: 30808272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.
    Coane JH; McBride DM; Termonen ML; Cutting JC
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 26250805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K; Maloney LT
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Feb; 47(2):266-278. PubMed ID: 30288686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Starns JJ; Olchowski JE
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 25084988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the limits of familiarity accounts in lexical decision: The case of repetition effects.
    Perea M; Marcet A; Vergara-Martínez M; Gomez P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):375-383. PubMed ID: 31552796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes.
    Starns JJ; Pazzaglia AM; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ; Macmillan NA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1377-92. PubMed ID: 23565789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three tests and three corrections: comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
    Jang Y; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):513-23. PubMed ID: 22390323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH; Pardini AM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):842-854. PubMed ID: 30790209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.