169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22736619)
1. The impact of fabrication parameters and substrate stiffness in direct writing of living constructs.
Tirella A; Ahluwalia A
Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(5):1315-20. PubMed ID: 22736619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Substrate stiffness influences high resolution printing of living cells with an ink-jet system.
Tirella A; Vozzi F; De Maria C; Vozzi G; Sandri T; Sassano D; Cognolato L; Ahluwalia A
J Biosci Bioeng; 2011 Jul; 112(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 21497548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
Xu T; Binder KW; Albanna MZ; Dice D; Zhao W; Yoo JJ; Atala A
Biofabrication; 2013 Mar; 5(1):015001. PubMed ID: 23172542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scaffold-free inkjet printing of three-dimensional zigzag cellular tubes.
Xu C; Chai W; Huang Y; Markwald RR
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2012 Dec; 109(12):3152-60. PubMed ID: 22767299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Layer-by-layer tissue microfabrication supports cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo.
Catros S; Guillemot F; Nandakumar A; Ziane S; Moroni L; Habibovic P; van Blitterswijk C; Rousseau B; Chassande O; Amédée J; Fricain JC
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2012 Jan; 18(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 21895563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of printing parameters and scaffold biopolymer properties in the efficacy of a new hybrid nano-bioprinting system.
Buyukhatipoglu K; Jo W; Sun W; Clyne AM
Biofabrication; 2009 Sep; 1(3):035003. PubMed ID: 20811107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a three-dimensional bioprinter: construction of cell supporting structures using hydrogel and state-of-the-art inkjet technology.
Nishiyama Y; Nakamura M; Henmi C; Yamaguchi K; Mochizuki S; Nakagawa H; Takiura K
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):035001. PubMed ID: 19154078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability.
Billiet T; Gevaert E; De Schryver T; Cornelissen M; Dubruel P
Biomaterials; 2014 Jan; 35(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 24112804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems.
Hutmacher DW; Sittinger M; Risbud MV
Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):354-62. PubMed ID: 15245908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laser-assisted bioprinting for creating on-demand patterns of human osteoprogenitor cells and nano-hydroxyapatite.
Catros S; Fricain JC; Guillotin B; Pippenger B; Bareille R; Remy M; Lebraud E; Desbat B; Amédée J; Guillemot F
Biofabrication; 2011 Jun; 3(2):025001. PubMed ID: 21527813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PAM2 (piston assisted microsyringe): a new rapid prototyping technique for biofabrication of cell incorporated scaffolds.
Tirella A; Vozzi F; Vozzi G; Ahluwalia A
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2011 Feb; 17(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 20799910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations.
Christensen K; Xu C; Chai W; Zhang Z; Fu J; Huang Y
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2015 May; 112(5):1047-55. PubMed ID: 25421556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D printing of photocurable poly(glycerol sebacate) elastomers.
Yeh YC; Highley CB; Ouyang L; Burdick JA
Biofabrication; 2016 Oct; 8(4):045004. PubMed ID: 27716633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scaffolds for tissue engineering and 3D cell culture.
Carletti E; Motta A; Migliaresi C
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 695():17-39. PubMed ID: 21042963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology.
Xu T; Zhao W; Zhu JM; Albanna MZ; Yoo JJ; Atala A
Biomaterials; 2013 Jan; 34(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 23063369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimising the biocompatibility of 3D printed photopolymer constructs in vitro and in vivo.
Ngan CGY; O'Connell CD; Blanchard R; Boyd-Moss M; Williams RJ; Bourke J; Quigley A; McKelvie P; Kapsa RMI; Choong PFM
Biomed Mater; 2019 Mar; 14(3):035007. PubMed ID: 30795002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional inkjet biofabrication based on designed images.
Arai K; Iwanaga S; Toda H; Genci C; Nishiyama Y; Nakamura M
Biofabrication; 2011 Sep; 3(3):034113. PubMed ID: 21900730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of surfactant and gentle agitation on inkjet dispensing of living cells.
Parsa S; Gupta M; Loizeau F; Cheung KC
Biofabrication; 2010 Jun; 2(2):025003. PubMed ID: 20811131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated with an advanced electrohydrodynamic direct-printing method for bone tissue regeneration.
Ahn SH; Lee HJ; Kim GH
Biomacromolecules; 2011 Dec; 12(12):4256-63. PubMed ID: 22070169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional plotting is a versatile rapid prototyping method for the customized manufacturing of complex scaffolds and tissue engineering constructs.
Luo Y; Akkineni AR; Gelinsky M
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 28(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 24844004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
