157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22737236)
21. Organization of foraging behavior in larvae of cosmopolitan, widespread, and endemic Drosophila species.
Godoy-Herrera R; Connolly K
Behav Genet; 2007 Jul; 37(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 17394057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of courtship song in female mate choice in South American Cactophilic Drosophila.
Iglesias PP; Hasson E
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176119. PubMed ID: 28467464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differences in tolerance to host cactus alkaloids in Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii.
Soto IM; Carreira VP; Corio C; Padró J; Soto EM; Hasson E
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88370. PubMed ID: 24520377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pupariation site preference within and between Drosophila sibling species.
Erezyilmaz DF; Stern DL
Evolution; 2013 Sep; 67(9):2714-27. PubMed ID: 24033178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evolved differences in larval social behavior mediated by novel pheromones.
Mast JD; De Moraes CM; Alborn HT; Lavis LD; Stern DL
Elife; 2014 Dec; 3():e04205. PubMed ID: 25497433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetics of food preference in Drosophila sechellia. I. Responses to food attractants.
Higa I; Fuyama Y
Genetica; 1993; 88(2-3):129-36. PubMed ID: 8224853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Drosophila Food-Associated Pheromones: Effect of Experience, Genotype and Antibiotics on Larval Behavior.
Thibert J; Farine JP; Cortot J; Ferveur JF
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151451. PubMed ID: 26987117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mulching as a cultural control strategy for Drosophila suzukii in blueberry.
Rendon D; Hamby KA; Arsenault-Benoit AL; Taylor CM; Evans RK; Roubos CR; Sial AA; Rogers M; Petran A; Van Timmeren S; Fanning P; Isaacs R; Walton V
Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Jan; 76(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 31207075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial aggregation across ephemeral resource patches in insect communities: an adaptive response to natural enemies?
Rohlfs M; Hoffmeister TS
Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 15232730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.
Nagarajan A; Natarajan SB; Jayaram M; Thammanna A; Chari S; Bose J; Jois SV; Joshi A
J Genet; 2016 Jun; 95(2):411-25. PubMed ID: 27350686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Chemically induced plasticity in early life history of
Ituarte RB; Vázquez MG; Bas CC
J Exp Biol; 2019 Jun; 222(Pt 13):. PubMed ID: 31171603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oviposition site preferences and performance in natural resources in the human commensals Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Soto EM; Soto IM; Cortese MD; Hasson E
Fly (Austin); 2011; 5(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21540639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of Hsp70 expression and thermotolerance in adults and larvae of three Drosophila species.
Krebs RA
Cell Stress Chaperones; 1999 Dec; 4(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10590838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Drosophila nociceptors mediate larval aversion to dry surface environments utilizing both the painless TRP channel and the DEG/ENaC subunit, PPK1.
Johnson WA; Carder JW
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32878. PubMed ID: 22403719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evolutionary compromises to metabolic toxins: Ammonia and urea tolerance in Drosophila suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster.
Belloni V; Galeazzi A; Bernini G; Mandrioli M; Versace E; Haase A
Physiol Behav; 2018 Jul; 191():146-154. PubMed ID: 29679661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Larval pupation site preference and its relationship to the glue proteins in a few species of Drosophila.
Shivanna N; Murthy GS; Ramesh SR
Genome; 1996 Feb; 39(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 8851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Loci of Behavioral Evolution: Evidence That Fas2 and tilB Underlie Differences in Pupation Site Choice Behavior between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
Pischedda A; Shahandeh MP; Turner TL
Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Mar; 37(3):864-880. PubMed ID: 31774527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Larval foraging behaviour and competition in Drosophila melanogaster.
Ruiz-Dubreuil G; Burnet B; Connolly K; Furness P
Heredity (Edinb); 1996 Jan; 76 ( Pt 1)():55-64. PubMed ID: 8575932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sensory attributes, physicochemical and antioxidant characteristics, and protein profile of wild prickly pear fruits (O. macrocentra Engelm., O. phaeacantha Engelm., and O. engelmannii Salm-Dyck ex Engelmann.) and commercial prickly pear fruits (O. ficus-indica (L.) Mill.).
Valero-Galván J; González-Fernández R; Sigala-Hernández A; Núñez-Gastélum JA; Ruiz-May E; Rodrigo-García J; Larqué-Saavedra A; Martínez-Ruiz NDR
Food Res Int; 2021 Feb; 140():109909. PubMed ID: 33648207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Carnivory in the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster and other Drosophila species.
Yang D
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15484. PubMed ID: 30341324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
