These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22737344)

  • 1. Four-dot Artifact on Automated Perimetry.
    Razeghinejad MR; Khalili MR
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2010 Apr; 5(2):136-7. PubMed ID: 22737344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry.
    Jamara RJ; Van De Velde F; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 12858085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects.
    Wall M; Ketoff KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 120(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 7485360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using motion perimetry to detect visual field defects in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Montgomery EB
    Neurology; 1995 Jun; 45(6):1169-75. PubMed ID: 7783884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of blue light spectrum filter on short-wavelength and standard automated perimetries.
    Castro LC; de Souza CE; Soriano ES; Melo LA; Paranhos A
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(5):725-9. PubMed ID: 17187143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
    Delgado MF; Nguyen NT; Cox TA; Singh K; Lee DA; Dueker DK; Fechtner RD; Juzych MS; Lin SC; Netland PA; Pastor SA; Schuman JS; Samples JR;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Dec; 109(12):2362-74. PubMed ID: 12466186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between visual field testing and scanning laser polarimetry in patients with a large cup-to-disk ratio.
    Tannenbaum DP; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Oct; 132(4):501-6. PubMed ID: 11589870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Kamantigue ME; Joson PJ; Chen PP
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 7710398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive value of short-wavelength automated perimetry: a 3-year follow-up study.
    Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pinilla I; Perez S; Gonzalvo F; Honrubia FM
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr; 109(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 11927437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 11384565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients.
    Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between parapapillary atrophy and visual field abnormality in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Kono Y; Zangwill L; Sample PA; Jonas JB; Emdadi A; Gupta N; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 127(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 10372877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Weinreb RN
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Sep; 115(9):1129-33. PubMed ID: 9298053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Sensitivity of size I stimulus in achromatic automated perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field defects: a comparative analysis with short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry (SITA)].
    Mattos Tde C; Kasahara N; Della Paolera M; Cohen R; Mandia Junior C; Almeida GV
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 18516409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [15 years automated perimetry--where does the path lead?].
    Lachenmayr B; Lund OE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Dec; 205(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 7869681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.