These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22737873)
1. [Analysis of disyllabic mandarin speech test results of normal hearing persons with different ages]. Wang Y; Zhang H; Tong J; Guo J; Zheng Z; Wu W; Chen J; Li Y Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(7):312-5. PubMed ID: 22737873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Cameron S; Dillon H Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study. Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children. Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of SC-10: A psychometrically equivalent Singapore Mandarin disyllabic word list for clinical speech audiometry use. Lee GJC; Lee SLH World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Jul; 7(3):247-256. PubMed ID: 34430833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a Mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (I): homogeneity selection. Ji F; Xi X; Chen AT; Ying J; Wang QJ; Yang SM Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 131(9):962-9. PubMed ID: 21534715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of dialect on speech audiometry testing. Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Richardson NE; Garlick JA; Eggett DL Am J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 22(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 23824434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry. Hagerman B Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of spatial hearing to speech recognition in young people with normal hearing. Song PL; Li HJ; Wang NY Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(24):4269-74. PubMed ID: 22340398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population. Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digit speech recognition threshold (SRT) in children with normal hearing ages 5-8 years. Ramkissoon I; Estis JM; Gaal Flagge A Am J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 24686505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy. Haynes DS; O'Malley M; Cohen S; Watford K; Labadie RF Laryngoscope; 2007 Jan; 117(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 17202923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. van Wieringen A; Wouters J Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18569107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New measures of masked text recognition in relation to speech-in-noise perception and their associations with age and cognitive abilities. Besser J; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Festen JM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):194-209. PubMed ID: 22199191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure. Zheng Y; Meng ZL; Wang K; Tao Y; Xu K; Soli SD Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 19726935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]