These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22738395)

  • 21. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
    Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
    Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Briganti A; Capitanio U; Chun FK; Gallina A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Bertini R; Guazzoni G; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
    Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 18514383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
    Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extended vs standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Eden CG; Arora A; Rouse P
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 20132202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pelvimetric dimensions do not impact upon nerve sparing or erectile function recovery in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    von Bodman C; Matikainen MP; Favaretto RL; Matsushita K; Mulhall JP; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Akin O; Rabbani F
    J Sex Med; 2011 Feb; 8(2):567-74. PubMed ID: 20584126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is the definition of a satisfactory erectile function after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy?
    Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Tutolo M; Bianchi M; Salonia A; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Martinez-Salamanca JI; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    J Sex Med; 2011 Apr; 8(4):1210-7. PubMed ID: 21269392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective comprehensive assessment of sexual function after retropubic non nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
    Trinchieri A; Nicola M; Masini F; Mangiarotti B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Dec; 77(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 16444937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Tadalafil Once-Daily or On-Demand vs Placebo on Return to Baseline Erectile Function After Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy--Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial (REACTT).
    Mulhall JP; Brock G; Oelke M; Fode M; Probst KA; Henneges C; d'Anzeo G; Rossi A; Büttner H
    J Sex Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):679-83. PubMed ID: 27045264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Fossati N; Willemse PM; Van den Broeck T; van den Bergh RCN; Yuan CY; Briers E; Bellmunt J; Bolla M; Cornford P; De Santis M; MacPepple E; Henry AM; Mason MD; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; van der Kwast TH; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Lam TB; Mottet N; Joniau S
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):84-109. PubMed ID: 28126351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of functional outcomes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of conditional survival analyses.
    Abdollah F; Sun M; Suardi N; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Tian Z; Salonia A; Colombo R; Rigatti P; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 22421080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extended versus standard pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role of extended template as an independent predictor of lymph node invasion with comparable morbidity burden.
    Mistretta FA; Boeri L; Grasso AA; Lo Russo V; Albo G; DE Lorenzis E; Maggioni M; Palmisano F; Dell'orto P; Bosari S; Rocco B
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Oct; 69(5):475-485. PubMed ID: 28281741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Four-point Peritoneal Flap Fixation in Preventing Lymphocele Formation Following Radical Prostatectomy.
    Stolzenburg JU; Arthanareeswaran VKA; Dietel A; Franz T; Liatsikos E; Kyriazis I; Ganzer R; Yaney K; Do HM
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):443-448. PubMed ID: 31158086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    KleinJan GH; Sikorska K; Korne CM; Brouwer OR; Buckle T; Tillier C; van der Roest RCM; de Jong J; van Leeuwen FWB; van der Poel HG
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):455-462. PubMed ID: 30178300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Liss MA; Palazzi K; Stroup SP; Jabaji R; Raheem OA; Kane CJ
    World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 23512231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of erectile function after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a single center.
    Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Rozet F; Barret E; Giuliano F; Galiano M; Prapotnich D; Kazzazi A; Djavan B; Jaffe J; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
    Can J Urol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):6328-35. PubMed ID: 22892254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.
    Briganti A; Blute ML; Eastham JH; Graefen M; Heidenreich A; Karnes JR; Montorsi F; Studer UE
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1251-65. PubMed ID: 19297079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Defining the impact of vascular risk factors on erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy.
    Teloken PE; Nelson CJ; Karellas M; Stasi J; Eastham J; Scardino PT; Mulhall JP
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):653-7. PubMed ID: 22758405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preoperative erectile function is an independent predictor for decision to spare cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy.
    Stember DS; Nelson CJ; Mulhall JP
    J Sex Med; 2013 Aug; 10(8):2101-7. PubMed ID: 23679104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The learning curve for laparoscopic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for compliance with existing guidelines.
    Eden CG; Zacharakis E; Bott S
    BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 23419154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation.
    Rabbani F; Patel M; Cozzi P; Mulhall JP; Scardino PT
    BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19338540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.