These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22738667)

  • 1. A new analytical approach to landscape genetic modelling: least-cost transect analysis and linear mixed models.
    VAN Strien MJ; Keller D; Holderegger R
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(16):4010-23. PubMed ID: 22738667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates.
    Koen EL; Bowman J; Walpole AA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Jul; 12(4):686-96. PubMed ID: 22353473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Habitat distribution influences dispersal and fine-scale genetic population structure of eastern foxsnakes (Mintonius gloydi) across a fragmented landscape.
    Row JR; Blouin-Demers G; Lougheed SC
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Dec; 19(23):5157-71. PubMed ID: 20977510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A landscape genetics approach for quantifying the relative influence of historic and contemporary habitat heterogeneity on the genetic connectivity of a rainforest bird.
    Pavlacky DC; Goldizen AW; Prentis PJ; Nicholls JA; Lowe AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(14):2945-60. PubMed ID: 19549110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum).
    Spear SF; Peterson CR; Matocq MD; Storfer A
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2553-64. PubMed ID: 15969734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog?
    Lee-Yaw JA; Davidson A; McRae BH; Green DM
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(9):1863-74. PubMed ID: 19302465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis.
    Spear SF; Balkenhol N; Fortin MJ; McRae BH; Scribner K
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3576-91. PubMed ID: 20723064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative landscape genetics of two pond-breeding amphibian species in a highly modified agricultural landscape.
    Goldberg CS; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3650-63. PubMed ID: 20723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense).
    Wang IJ; Savage WK; Shaffer HB
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1365-74. PubMed ID: 19368644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dispersal ability and habitat requirements determine landscape-level genetic patterns in desert aquatic insects.
    Phillipsen IC; Kirk EH; Bogan MT; Mims MC; Olden JD; Lytle DA
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jan; 24(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 25402260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach.
    Braunisch V; Segelbacher G; Hirzel AH
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3664-78. PubMed ID: 20723058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial scale affects landscape genetic analysis of a wetland grasshopper.
    Keller D; Holderegger R; van Strien MJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 May; 22(9):2467-82. PubMed ID: 23452260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Streams over mountains: influence of riparian connectivity on gene flow in the Pacific jumping mouse (Zapus trinotatus).
    Vignieri SN
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1925-37. PubMed ID: 15910316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert-based versus habitat-suitability models to develop resistance surfaces in landscape genetics.
    Milanesi P; Holderegger R; Caniglia R; Fabbri E; Galaverni M; Randi E
    Oecologia; 2017 Jan; 183(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 27730367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach.
    Coulon A; Cosson JF; Angibault JM; Cargnelutti B; Galan M; Morellet N; Petit E; Aulagnier S; Hewison AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Sep; 13(9):2841-50. PubMed ID: 15315694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population structure of spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) in a fragmented landscape.
    Purrenhage JL; Niewiarowski PH; Moore FB
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jan; 18(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 19192178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation with gene flow across the landscape in a dune sunflower.
    Andrew RL; Ostevik KL; Ebert DP; Rieseberg LH
    Mol Ecol; 2012 May; 21(9):2078-91. PubMed ID: 22429200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Pérez-Espona S; Pérez-Barbería FJ; McLeod JE; Jiggins CD; Gordon IJ; Pemberton JM
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Feb; 17(4):981-96. PubMed ID: 18261043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urban landscape genetics: canopy cover predicts gene flow between white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) populations in New York City.
    Munshi-South J
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Mar; 21(6):1360-78. PubMed ID: 22320856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis).
    Bruggeman DJ; Wiegand T; Fernández N
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3679-91. PubMed ID: 20618895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.