These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Magnetic-resonance velocity mapping of the central circulation. Søndergaard L Clin Physiol; 1994 May; 14(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 8026149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrafast flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Zhang H; Halliburton SS; Moore JR; Simonetti OP; Schvartzman PR; White RD; Chatzimavroudis GP Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Jan; 30(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 11874135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimation of pressure gradients in pulsatile flow from magnetic resonance acceleration measurements. Tasu JP; Mousseaux E; Delouche A; Oddou C; Jolivet O; Bittoun J Magn Reson Med; 2000 Jul; 44(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10893523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Measurement Using Phase Contrast MRI for Estimating the Post-Stenotic Pressure Drop: In Vitro Validation and Clinical Application. Ha H; Kim GB; Kweon J; Huh HK; Lee SJ; Koo HJ; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kim DH; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151540. PubMed ID: 26978529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images. Evans AJ; Blinder RA; Herfkens RJ; Spritzer CE; Kuethe DO; Fram EK; Hedlund LW Invest Radiol; 1988 Jul; 23(7):512-8. PubMed ID: 3170139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic resonance velocity imaging: a new method for prosthetic heart valve study. Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Oyre S; Flepp L; Ringgaard S; Heinrich RS; Walton SP; Hasenkam JM; Jorgensen HS; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 May; 4(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 7655694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An in vitro investigation of the influence of stenosis severity on the flow in the ascending aorta. Gülan U; Lüthi B; Holzner M; Liberzon A; Tsinober A; Kinzelbach W Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1147-55. PubMed ID: 25066583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Velocity profiles in stenosed models using magnetic resonance imaging. Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():43-53. PubMed ID: 2136929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Velocity measurements in steady flow through axisymmetric stenoses at moderate Reynolds numbers. Ahmed SA; Giddens DP J Biomech; 1983; 16(7):505-16. PubMed ID: 6619168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new approach for the evaluation of the severity of coarctation of the aorta using Doppler velocity index and effective orifice area: in vitro validation and clinical implications. Keshavarz-Motamed Z; Garcia J; Maftoon N; Bedard E; Chetaille P; Kadem L J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1239-45. PubMed ID: 22342139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the accuracy of EPI-based phase contrast velocimetry. Moser KW; Georgiadis JG; Buckius RO Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Nov; 18(9):1115-23. PubMed ID: 11118766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Experimental studies on magnetic resonance tomographic and magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of poststenotic flow patterns]. Krug B; Kugel H; Friedmann G; Bunke J; van Dijk P; Schmidt R; Hirche HJ Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 1596553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Blood flow measurement using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval. Buonocore MH Magn Reson Med; 1993 Jun; 29(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 8350722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Noninvasive quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic valve disease using online digital computer analysis of Doppler velocity data. Isaaz K; Bruntz JF; Da Costa A; Winninger D; Cerisier A; de Chillou C; Sadoul N; Lamaud M; Ethevenot G; Aliot E J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Sep; 16(9):965-74. PubMed ID: 12931109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of acquisition parameters on the accuracy of velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging blood flow measurements. Greil G; Geva T; Maier SE; Powell AJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Jan; 15(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11793456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mapping aortic hemodynamics using 3D cine phase contrast magnetic resonance parallel imaging: evaluation of an anisotropic diffusion filter. Tresoldi D; Cadioli M; Ponzini R; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Morbiducci U; Rizzo G Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1621-31. PubMed ID: 23798317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]