125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22739384)
1. Intraoperative myelography in minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Pao JL; Wang JL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E117-24. PubMed ID: 22739384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient outcomes for a minimally invasive approach to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis: is microendoscopic or microscopic decompressive laminotomy the less invasive surgery?
Fujimoto T; Taniwaki T; Tahata S; Nakamura T; Mizuta H
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Apr; 131():21-5. PubMed ID: 25666763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of postdecompression facet joint effusion after minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Pao JL; Chen WC; Chang CH; Chen CS; Wang JL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Dec; 27(8):E318-23. PubMed ID: 25075985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Pao JL; Chen WC; Chen PQ
Eur Spine J; 2009 May; 18(5):672-8. PubMed ID: 19238459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative Myelography in Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Preliminary Prospective Study.
Yang Y; Zhang L; Dong J; Chen Z; Xie P; Chen R; He L; Feng F; Rong L; Liu B
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3742182. PubMed ID: 29230406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral operation of lumbar degenerative central spinal stenosis in full-endoscopic interlaminar technique with unilateral approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients.
Komp M; Hahn P; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 20975592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results.
Hwa Eum J; Hwa Heo D; Son SK; Park CK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 26722954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.
Cho DY; Lin HL; Lee WY; Lee HC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 17355022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
