These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22739384)
1. Intraoperative myelography in minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Pao JL; Wang JL J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E117-24. PubMed ID: 22739384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient outcomes for a minimally invasive approach to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis: is microendoscopic or microscopic decompressive laminotomy the less invasive surgery? Fujimoto T; Taniwaki T; Tahata S; Nakamura T; Mizuta H Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Apr; 131():21-5. PubMed ID: 25666763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of postdecompression facet joint effusion after minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Pao JL; Chen WC; Chang CH; Chen CS; Wang JL J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Dec; 27(8):E318-23. PubMed ID: 25075985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative Myelography in Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Preliminary Prospective Study. Yang Y; Zhang L; Dong J; Chen Z; Xie P; Chen R; He L; Feng F; Rong L; Liu B Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3742182. PubMed ID: 29230406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up. Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral operation of lumbar degenerative central spinal stenosis in full-endoscopic interlaminar technique with unilateral approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients. Komp M; Hahn P; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 20975592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation. Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction. den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance. Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis. Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. Hwa Eum J; Hwa Heo D; Son SK; Park CK J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 26722954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report. Cho DY; Lin HL; Lee WY; Lee HC J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 17355022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity. Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis. Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]