These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22739406)

  • 1. Mathematical modeling of microbubble cavitation at 70 kHz and the importance of the subharmonic in drug delivery from micelles.
    Díaz de la Rosa MA; Husseini GA; Pitt WG
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Jan; 53(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 22739406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing microbubble cavitation at 500 kHz and 70 kHz related to micellar drug delivery using ultrasound.
    Diaz de la Rosa MA; Husseini GA; Pitt WG
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Feb; 53(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 22901396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonlinear dynamic behavior of microscopic bubbles near a rigid wall.
    Suslov SA; Ooi A; Manasseh R
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jun; 85(6 Pt 2):066309. PubMed ID: 23005208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement and control of acoustic cavitation yield by low-level dual frequency sonication: a subharmonic analysis.
    Hasanzadeh H; Mokhtari-Dizaji M; Bathaie SZ; Hassan ZM; Nilchiani V; Goudarzi H
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2011 Jan; 18(1):394-400. PubMed ID: 20678953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of coupling, bubble size, and spatial arrangement on chaotic dynamics of microbubble cluster in ultrasonic fields.
    Dzaharudin F; Suslov SA; Manasseh R; Ooi A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3425-34. PubMed ID: 24180753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling non-spherical oscillations and stability of acoustically driven shelled microbubbles.
    Loughran J; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4349-57. PubMed ID: 22712909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of local dual frequency sonication on drug distribution from polymeric nanomicelles.
    Hasanzadeh H; Mokhtari-Dizaji M; Bathaie SZ; Hassan ZM
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2011 Sep; 18(5):1165-71. PubMed ID: 21489850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery.
    Kooiman K; Vos HJ; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2014 Jun; 72():28-48. PubMed ID: 24667643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple method for quantifying ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.
    Hung SH; Yeh CK; Tsai TH; Chen T; Chen RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study on the bubble transport mechanism in an acoustic standing wave field.
    Xi X; Cegla FB; Lowe M; Thiemann A; Nowak T; Mettin R; Holsteyns F; Lippert A
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):1014-25. PubMed ID: 21719064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of correlation between chemical dosimetry and subharmonic spectrum analysis to examine the acoustic cavitation.
    Hasanzadeh H; Mokhtari-Dizaji M; Bathaie SZ; Hassan ZM
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2010 Jun; 17(5):863-9. PubMed ID: 20236851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of microbubble response to long pulses used in ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery.
    Mannaris C; Averkiou MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 22341047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear emission from individual bound microbubbles at high frequencies.
    Sprague MR; Chérin E; Goertz DE; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-24. PubMed ID: 20018429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subharmonic response of encapsulated microbubbles: conditions for existence and amplification.
    Kimmel E; Krasovitski B; Hoogi A; Razansky D; Adam D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1767-76. PubMed ID: 17720301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
    Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling photothermal and acoustical induced microbubble generation and growth.
    Krasovitski B; Kislev H; Kimmel E
    Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):90-101. PubMed ID: 17910969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doxorubicin delivery into tumor cells with ultrasound and microbubbles.
    Escoffre JM; Piron J; Novell A; Bouakaz A
    Mol Pharm; 2011 Jun; 8(3):799-806. PubMed ID: 21495672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
    Faez T; Renaud G; Defontaine M; Calle S; de Jong N
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6459-73. PubMed ID: 21934190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Dollet B; Overvelde M; Garbin V; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3239-52. PubMed ID: 21110619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.
    Karshafian R; Bevan PD; Williams R; Samac S; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):847-60. PubMed ID: 19110370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.