51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22740059)
1. A combined approach for individualized lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer patients.
Varga Z; Bíró A; Török M; Tóth D
Pathol Oncol Res; 2023; 29():1611270. PubMed ID: 37456519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in gastric cancer.
Varga Z; Kolozsi P; Nagy K; Tóth D
Front Surg; 2022; 9():1093324. PubMed ID: 36644530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymph Node Mapping in Gastric Cancer Surgery: Current Status and New Horizons.
Zulfikaroglu B; Kucuk O; Soydal C; Mahir Ozmen M
Turk J Surg; 2020 Dec; 36(4):393-398. PubMed ID: 33778399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do all the European surgeons perform the same D2? The need of D2 audit in Europe.
Bencivenga M; Verlato G; Mengardo V; Weindelmayer J; Allum WH
Updates Surg; 2018 Jun; 70(2):189-195. PubMed ID: 29869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Ratio-Based N Staging System Can More Accurately Reflect the Prognosis of T4 Gastric Cancer Patients with D2 Lymphadenectomy Compared with the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging System.
Hwang SH; Kim HI; Song JS; Lee MH; Kwon SJ; Kim MG
J Gastric Cancer; 2016 Dec; 16(4):207-214. PubMed ID: 28053806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.
Tóth D; Plósz J; Török M
World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2016 Feb; 8(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 26909128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of accurate identification of lymph node status in distant metastatic gastric cancer.
Zhou R; Wu Z; Zhang J; Wang H; Su Y; Huang N; Shi M; Bin J; Liao Y; Liao W
Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(1):1029-41. PubMed ID: 26556854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection.
Ke B; Song XN; Liu N; Zhang RP; Wang CL; Liang H
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96455. PubMed ID: 24811256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.
Wada N; Imoto S; Hasebe T; Ochiai A; Ebihara S; Moriyama N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 Mar; 34(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 15078905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of CEUS-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: a study review and meta-analysis.
Cui Q; Dai L; Li J; Xue J
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 32471428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, comparative study for the evaluation of lymph node involvement in gastric cancer: Maruyama computer program versus sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Tóth D; Török M; Kincses Z; Damjanovich L
Gastric Cancer; 2013 Apr; 16(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 22740059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal detection of sentinel lymph node metastases by intraoperative radioactive threshold and molecular analysis in patients with melanoma.
Manca G; Romanini A; Pellegrino D; Borsò E; Rondini M; Orlandini C; Zucchi V; Pasqualetti F; Mariani G
J Nucl Med; 2008 Nov; 49(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 18927334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precise pathologic examination decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer.
Lee HS; Lee HE; Park DJ; Park YS; Kim HH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):772-8. PubMed ID: 21979113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of gastric cancer lymph node status by sentinel lymph node biopsy and the Maruyama computer model.
Gretschel S; Bembenek A; Ulmer Ch; Hünerbein M; Markwardt J; Schneider U; Schlag PM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 31(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 15837046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prospective comparative study of sentinel lymph node mapping in gastric cancer -- submucosal versus subserosal marking method].
Tóth D; Kathy S; Csobán T; Kincses Z; Török M; Plósz J; Damjanovich L
Magy Seb; 2012 Feb; 65(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22343099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
