These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22740174)

  • 1. Probation officers' perceptions of youths' risk of reoffending and use of risk assessment in case management.
    Perrault RT; Paiva-Salisbury M; Vincent GM
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(4):487-505. PubMed ID: 22740174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partners or adversaries? The relation between juvenile diversion supervision and parenting practices.
    Fine AD; Rowan ZR; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):461-473. PubMed ID: 33444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does risk assessment make a difference? Results of implementing the SAVRY in juvenile probation.
    Vincent GM; Guy LS; Gershenson BG; McCabe P
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(4):384-405. PubMed ID: 22745028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating probation strategies with juvenile offenders: the influence of officers' attitudes and youth characteristics.
    Schwalbe CS; Maschi T
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):357-67. PubMed ID: 18839292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of community-based provider reports on juvenile probation officers' recommendations: Effects of positive and negative framing on decision making.
    Gale-Bentz E; Goldstein NES; Cole LM; Durham K
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 30702306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Juvenile probation officers' mental health decision making.
    Wasserman GA; McReynolds LS; Whited AL; Keating JM; Musabegovic H; Huo Y
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2008 Sep; 35(5):410-22. PubMed ID: 18642071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Juvenile probation officers' perceptions on youth substance use varies from task-shifting to family-based contingency management.
    Rudes DS; Viglione J; Sheidow AJ; McCart MR; Chapman JE; Taxman FS
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2021 Jan; 120():108144. PubMed ID: 33298307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of a brief RNR-based training on Turkish juvenile probation officers' punitive and rehabilitative attitudes and recidivism risk perceptions.
    Tuncer AE; Erdem G; de Ruiter C
    J Community Psychol; 2020 Apr; 48(3):921-931. PubMed ID: 31876967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Juvenile probation officers' evaluation of traumatic event exposures and traumatic stress symptoms as responsivity factors in risk assessment and case planning.
    Holloway ED; Cruise KR; Morin SL; Kaufman H; Steele RD
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):369-384. PubMed ID: 29620395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of psychopathy, abuse, and ethnicity on juvenile probation officers' decision-making and supervision strategies.
    Vidal S; Skeem JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):479-98. PubMed ID: 17294135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facilitators of Practitioner Adherence to a Risk/Need Assessment Tool: Hypothesis Testing on a Survey of Juvenile Probation Officers.
    Miller J; Maloney C
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2020 Dec; 64(16):1757-1778. PubMed ID: 32627627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probation officers' perspectives on interagency collaboration for juvenile offenders with mental health problems.
    Schwalbe CS; Maschi TM
    Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Aug; 63(8):830-3. PubMed ID: 22854729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field reliability of the SAVRY with juvenile probation officers: Implications for training.
    Vincent GM; Guy LS; Fusco SL; Gershenson BG
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 22667812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What's risk got to do with it: Judges' and probation officers' understanding and use of juvenile risk assessments in making residential placement decisions.
    McPhee J; Heilbrun K; Cubbon DN; Soler M; Goldstein NE
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 37053385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AIDS knowledge, condom attitudes, and risk-taking sexual behavior of substance-abusing juvenile offenders on probation or parole.
    Robertson A; Levin ML
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Oct; 11(5):450-61. PubMed ID: 10555628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bringing hope and change: a study of youth probation officers in Toronto.
    Umamaheswar J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Sep; 57(9):1158-82. PubMed ID: 22573709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.
    Childs KK; Ryals J; Frick PJ; Lawing K; Phillippi SW; Deprato DK
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 23606362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probation Officer Role Emphases and Use of Risk Assessment Information before and after Training.
    Ricks EP; Eno Louden J; Kennealy PJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):337-51. PubMed ID: 26990018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Police response to domestic violence: making decisions about risk and risk management.
    Perez Trujillo M; Ross S
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Apr; 23(4):454-73. PubMed ID: 18252942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting probation revocation and residential facility placement at juvenile probation review hearings: Youth-specific and hearing-specific factors.
    NeMoyer A; Brooks Holliday S; Goldstein NE; McKitten RL
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 26550679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.