173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22740340)
1. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: prognostic factors and outcomes.
Hoekstra AV; Kim RJ; Small W; Rademaker AW; Helenowski IB; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 19428094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.
Jolly S; Vargas CE; Kumar T; Weiner SA; Brabbins DS; Chen PY; Floyd W; Martinez AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 16545441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: review of 43 cases].
Ma SK; Zhang HT; Sun YC; Wu LY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 30(9):690-4. PubMed ID: 19173912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology.
Lutman CV; Havrilesky LJ; Cragun JM; Secord AA; Calingaert B; Berchuck A; Clarke-Pearson DL; Soper JT
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 16406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems.
Tangjitgamol S; Srijaipracharoen S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J; Pataradool K; Thavaramara T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 May; 96(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 23745302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic significance of age in surgically staged patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma.
Vance S; Yechieli R; Cogan C; Hanna R; Munkarah A; Elshaikh MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jul; 126(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 22507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with combined radiotherapy and surgery: 437 cases].
Touboul E; Belkacémi Y; Buffat L; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Lhuillier P; Uzan S; Jannet D; Uzan M; Antoine M; Ginesty C; Ganansia V; Jamali M; Milliez J; Blondon J; Schlienger M
Cancer Radiother; 2001 Aug; 5(4):425-44. PubMed ID: 11521391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nodal distribution and its significance in FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer.
McMeekin DS; Lashbrook D; Gold M; Scribner DR; Kamelle S; Tillmanns TD; Mannel R
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Aug; 82(2):375-9. PubMed ID: 11531298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A suggested modification to FIGO stage I endometrial cancer.
Aristizabal P; Graesslin O; Barranger E; Clavel-Chapelon F; Haddad B; Luton D; Darai E; Rouzier R; Koskas M
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 24631453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy.
Nelson G; Randall M; Sutton G; Moore D; Hurteau J; Look K
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Nov; 75(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 10525373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multicenter analysis of adjuvant therapy after surgery for stage IIIC endometrial adenocarcinoma: A Korean Radiation Oncology Group study (KROG 13-17).
Yoon MS; Park W; Huh SJ; Kim HJ; Kim YS; Kim YB; Kim JY; Lee JH; Kim HJ; Cha J; Kim JH; Kim J; Yoon WS; Choi JH; Chun M; Choi Y; Chang SK; Lee KK; Kim M
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 26115977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
