These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22740780)

  • 21. Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals.
    Sutou S
    Genes Environ; 2018; 40():26. PubMed ID: 30598710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
    Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
    C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Tremendous Human, Social, and Economic Losses Caused by Obstinate Application of the Failed Linear No-threshold Model].
    Sutou S
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(11):1197-211. PubMed ID: 26521869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Prevention of cancer and the dose-effect relationship: the carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiations].
    Tubiana M
    Cancer Radiother; 2009 Jul; 13(4):238-58. PubMed ID: 19539515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
    Breckow J
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.
    Wong CM; Rabl A; Thach TQ; Chau YK; Chan KP; Cowling BJ; Lai HK; Lam TH; McGhee SM; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Aug; (170):5-91. PubMed ID: 23316618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Dose Response; 2015; 13(4):1559325815621764. PubMed ID: 26740815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cancer risk assessment: Optimizing human health through linear dose-response models.
    Calabrese EJ; Shamoun DY; Hanekamp JC
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2015 Jul; 81():137-140. PubMed ID: 25916915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
    Averbeck D
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat.
    Conolly RB; Kimbell JS; Janszen D; Schlosser PM; Kalisak D; Preston J; Miller FJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Oct; 75(2):432-47. PubMed ID: 12857938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose-response curves.
    Conolly RB; Gaylor DW; Lutz WK
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):570-5. PubMed ID: 15996697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Integration of LNT and Hormesis for Cancer Risk Assessment Optimizes Public Health Protection.
    Calabrese EJ; Shamoun DY; Hanekamp JC
    Health Phys; 2016 Mar; 110(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 26808876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here?
    Mossman KL
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):279-84; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 9547494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-linear dose-response of DNA-reactive genotoxins: recommendations for data analysis.
    Johnson GE; Doak SH; Griffiths SM; Quick EL; Skibinski DO; Zaïr ZM; Jenkins GJ
    Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 19467345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis: superposition of different mechanisms of action, resulting in linear-nonlinear curves, practical thresholds, J-shapes.
    Lutz WK
    Mutat Res; 1998 Sep; 405(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 9748532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EPA transparency proposal: testimony of Edward J. Calabrese, Ph.D, October 3, 2018.
    Calabrese EJ
    J Cell Commun Signal; 2019 Mar; 13(1):145-147. PubMed ID: 30560424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hypothesis testing and the choice of the dose-response model.
    Oughton D
    Toxicol Lett; 2006 Mar; 162(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 16325358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.