These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22740780)

  • 41. Perspective on the use of LNT for radiation protection and risk assessment by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    Puskin JS
    Dose Response; 2009 Aug; 7(4):284-91. PubMed ID: 20011649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Growth, bioluminescence and shoal behavior hormetic responses to inorganic and/or organic chemicals: a review.
    Hashmi MZ; Naveedullah ; Shen H; Zhu S; Yu C; Shen C
    Environ Int; 2014 Mar; 64():28-39. PubMed ID: 24361513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.
    Zhao Y; Lou IC; Conolly RB
    Dose Response; 2012; 10(2):251-73. PubMed ID: 22740786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Implications for human and environmental health of low doses of ionising radiation.
    Mothersill C; Seymour C
    J Environ Radioact; 2014 Jul; 133():5-9. PubMed ID: 23664231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.
    Scott BR
    Dose Response; 2006 May; 3(4):547-67. PubMed ID: 18648632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An approach to assessing stochastic radiogenic risk in medical imaging.
    Wolbarst AB; Hendee WR
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6654-8. PubMed ID: 22149847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro, hormesis and risk assessment.
    Redpath JL; Elmore E
    Dose Response; 2006 Dec; 5(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18648601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
    Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Thresholds for carcinogens.
    Calabrese EJ; Priest ND; Kozumbo WJ
    Chem Biol Interact; 2021 May; 341():109464. PubMed ID: 33823170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The relationship between the IC(50), toxic threshold, and the magnitude of stimulatory response in biphasic (hormetic) dose-responses.
    Nascarella MA; Calabrese EJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 19393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology.
    Averbeck D; Salomaa S; Bouffler S; Ottolenghi A; Smyth V; Sabatier L
    Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2018; 776():46-69. PubMed ID: 29807577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. JSFit: a method for the fitting and prediction of J- and S-shaped concentration-response curves.
    Wang ZJ; Liu SS; Qu R
    RSC Adv; 2018 Feb; 8(12):6572-6580. PubMed ID: 35540430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Hormesis-induced gap between the guidelines and reality in ecological risk assessment.
    Zhang X; Lin Z
    Chemosphere; 2020 Mar; 243():125348. PubMed ID: 31765892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The bell tolls for LNT.
    Higson DJ
    Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5 Suppl):S47-50. PubMed ID: 15551779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ionizing radiations epidemiology does not support the LNT model.
    Ricci PF; Tharmalingam S
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():128-140. PubMed ID: 30763555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Human respiratory tract cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde: dose-response predictions derived from biologically-motivated computational modeling of a combined rodent and human dataset.
    Conolly RB; Kimbell JS; Janszen D; Schlosser PM; Kalisak D; Preston J; Miller FJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 15254341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Linear No-threshold (LNT) vs. Hormesis: Paradigms, Assumptions, and Mathematical Conventions that Bias the Conclusions in Favor of LNT and Against hormesis.
    Sacks B; Meyerson G
    Health Phys; 2019 Jun; 116(6):807-816. PubMed ID: 30768437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Risk management for plausibly hormetic environmental carcinogens: the case of radon.
    Bogen KT; Layton DW
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Aug; 17(8):463-7. PubMed ID: 9756142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.