These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22741133)

  • 21. Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
    Martinek J; Maluskova J; Stefanova M; Tuckova I; Suchanek S; Vackova Z; Krajciova J; Kollar M; Zavoral M; Spicak J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5328-35. PubMed ID: 25954107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of endoscopic biopsy forceps characteristics on tissue specimens: results of a prospective randomized study.
    Woods KL; Anand BS; Cole RA; Osato MS; Genta RM; Malaty H; Gurer IE; Rossi DD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 9925695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.
    Dolwani S; Saleem H; Thompson IW; Allison MC
    Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):946-9. PubMed ID: 12471536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reusable versus disposable forceps: the dilemma of cost and safety.
    Gordon SJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):363-5. PubMed ID: 10699795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A cost comparison between reusable flexible and disposable laryngoscopes.
    Ellis J; Park AH; Prussin A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2022; 43(2):103321. PubMed ID: 34953249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An observer-blinded, prospective, randomized comparison of forceps for endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
    Schafer TW; Hollis-Perry KM; Mondragon RM; Brann OS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11818921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories.
    Ogoshi K
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G82-5. PubMed ID: 11100999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
    Petersen BT
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Eddie G; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Oct; 66(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8855921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of disposable endoscopic forceps according to the manufacturing techniques.
    Kwon CI; Kim G; Moon JP; Yun H; Ko WJ; Cho JY; Hong SP
    Korean J Intern Med; 2019 May; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 29502363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost comparison of reusable and disposable air/water syringe tips in a large French teaching hospital.
    Silva ML; Zumpe M; Lespinasse J; Aulois-Griot M
    Swiss Dent J; 2018 Jan; 128(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 30920783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-comparison study of reusable and disposable rhinolaryngoscopes in a large English teaching hospital.
    Morgan O; Elsayed M; Ramakrishnan Y; McGlashan J; Whynes D; McCahon R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2023 May; 137(5):541-545. PubMed ID: 35000627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Disposable versus Reusable Cystoscopes: A Micro-Costing Value Analysis in High-Volume and Low-Volume Urology Practices.
    Young JA; Garden EB; Al-Alao O; Deoraj D; Small AC; Hruby G; Grotas AB; Palese MA
    Urol Pract; 2021 Jul; 8(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 37145468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reuse of Biopsy Forceps may be Associated with Risk of Transmission of HCV in Egyptian Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
    El-Demerdash T; Yousef M; Abd-Elsalam S; Helmy A; Kobtan A; Elfert AA
    Infect Disord Drug Targets; 2019; 19(3):279-283. PubMed ID: 30324899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator-jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy.
    Abudayyeh S; Hoffman J; El-Zimaity HT; Graham DY
    Dig Liver Dis; 2009 May; 41(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 18799373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reprocessing of single-use endoscopic biopsy forceps and snares. One hospital's study.
    Hambrick D
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(3):112-5. PubMed ID: 11847859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
    Alfa MJ; Nemes R; Olson N; Mulaire A
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bionic Design of a Disposable Compliant Surgical Forceps With Optimized Clamping Performance.
    Sun Y; Zhang D; Lueth TC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():4704-4707. PubMed ID: 33019042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
    Jung M; Beilenhoff U; Pietsch M; Kraft B; Rippin G
    Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.