BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22742480)

  • 21. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
    Attilakos G; Sibanda T; Winter C; Johnson N; Draycott T
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1510-5. PubMed ID: 16225571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
    Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Kiwi Omnicup versus Malmstrom metal cup in vacuum assisted delivery: a randomized comparative trial.
    Ismail NA; Saharan WS; Zaleha MA; Jaafar R; Muhammad JA; Razi ZR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 18686348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vacuum extraction in twin deliveries-maternal and neonatal consequences: a retrospective cohort study.
    Rottenstreich M; Rotem R; Ehrlich Z; Rottenstreich A; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Shen O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 302(4):845-852. PubMed ID: 32643042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Operative vaginal deliveries and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes - prospective analysis.
    Morávková P; Hruban L; Jančářová D; Janků P; Gerychová R; Vinklerová P; Štěpánová R; Ventruba P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 31238678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery.
    Vacca A; Grant A; Wyatt G; Chalmers I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 90(12):1107-12. PubMed ID: 6652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital.
    Zhang VR; Tan EL; Edison PE; Kanagalingam D
    Singapore Med J; 2023 May; 64(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 35706407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cup detachment during vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and birth outcome.
    Krispin E; Aviram A; Salman L; Chen R; Wiznitzer A; Gabbay-Benziv R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):877-883. PubMed ID: 28871450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?
    Hendler I; Kirshenbaum M; Barg M; Kees S; Mazaki-Tovi S; Moran O; Kalter A; Schiff E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1861-1864. PubMed ID: 27550831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.
    Towner D; Castro MA; Eby-Wilkens E; Gilbert WM
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(23):1709-14. PubMed ID: 10580069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes after vacuum-assisted deliveries. Births attended by community family practitioners.
    Yarrow C; Benoit G; Klein MC
    Can Fam Physician; 2004 Aug; 50():1109-14. PubMed ID: 15455810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries.
    Doumouchtsis SK; Arulkumaran S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 18(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 16601472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section.
    Bhide A; Guven M; Prefumo F; Vankalayapati P; Thilaganathan B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jul; 20(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 17674268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis.
    Demissie K; Rhoads GG; Smulian JC; Balasubramanian BA; Gandhi K; Joseph KS; Kramer M
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7456):24-9. PubMed ID: 15231617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What happens when vacuum extraction fails?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Stainmetz S; Ben-Haroush A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 280(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 19116724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Wen SW; Liu S; Kramer MS; Marcoux S; Ohlsson A; Sauvé R; Liston R
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 153(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 11159152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.