These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22742910)

  • 1. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.
    Hoy D; Brooks P; Woolf A; Blyth F; March L; Bain C; Baker P; Smith E; Buchbinder R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):934-9. PubMed ID: 22742910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of 3 assessment tools used to evaluate randomized controlled trials for treatment of neck pain.
    Graham N; Haines T; Goldsmith CH; Gross A; Burnie S; Shahzad U; Talovikova E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 21673624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Stiles CR; Hagen NA; Biondo PD; Cummings GG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 18(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 20698919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.
    Kim SY; Park JE; Lee YJ; Seo HJ; Sheen SS; Hahn S; Jang BH; Son HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23337781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interrater reliability and convergent validity of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine methodology for conducting systematic reviews.
    Wiart L; Kolaski K; Butler C; Vogtle L; Logan LR; Hickman R; Romeiser J; Samson-Fang L; Matsuba CA; Baird MW; Roxborough L; Mayson T; Dinu I
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2012 Jul; 54(7):606-11. PubMed ID: 22577944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement.
    Grooten WJA; Tseli E; Äng BO; Boersma K; Stålnacke BM; Gerdle B; Enthoven P
    Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():5. PubMed ID: 31093575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.
    Hartling L; Hamm MP; Milne A; Vandermeer B; Santaguida PL; Ansari M; Tsertsvadze A; Hempel S; Shekelle P; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):973-81. PubMed ID: 22981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies.
    Viswanathan M; Berkman ND
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 21959223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of a treatment-based classification system for subgrouping people with low back pain.
    Henry SM; Fritz JM; Trombley AR; Bunn JY
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Sep; 42(9):797-805. PubMed ID: 22677525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of a survey tool for measuring consumer nutrition environment in urban food stores.
    Hosler AS; Dharssi A
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2011; 17(5):E1-8. PubMed ID: 21788772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unfolding the phenomenon of interrater agreement: a multicomponent approach for in-depth examination was proposed.
    Slaug B; Schilling O; Helle T; Iwarsson S; Carlsson G; Brandt Å
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):1016-25. PubMed ID: 22742912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials.
    Yamato TP; Maher C; Koes B; Moseley A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():176-181. PubMed ID: 28288916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability and clinical relevance of results in randomized controlled trials: the Cochrane review on exercise therapy for low back pain as an example.
    Malmivaara A; Koes BW; Bouter LM; van Tulder MW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1405-9. PubMed ID: 16741446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interrater reliability of a validated bronchiolitis severity assessment tool.
    Walsh P; Gonzales A; Satar A; Rothenberg SJ
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2006 May; 22(5):316-20. PubMed ID: 16714958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardizing assessment of elderly people in acute care: the interRAI Acute Care instrument.
    Gray LC; Bernabei R; Berg K; Finne-Soveri H; Fries BE; Hirdes JP; Jónsson PV; Morris JN; Steel K; Ariño-Blasco S
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2008 Mar; 56(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 18179498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.