These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22742932)

  • 1. Effect of posterolateral disc replacement on kinematics and stress distribution in the lumbar spine: a finite element study.
    Wang W; Zhang H; Sadeghipour K; Baran G
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Mar; 35(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 22742932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
    Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical changes of degenerated adjacent segment and intact lumbar spine after lumbosacral topping-off surgery: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Cao L; Liu Y; Mei W; Xu J; Zhan S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):104. PubMed ID: 32061252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of the L5-S1 motion segment after total disc replacement - Influence of iatrogenic distraction, implant positioning and preoperative disc height on the range of motion and loading of facet joints.
    Dreischarf M; Schmidt H; Putzier M; Zander T
    J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3283-91. PubMed ID: 26184587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar total disc replacement impingement sensitivity to disc height distraction, spinal sagittal orientation, implant position, and implant lordosis.
    Rundell SA; Day JS; Isaza J; Guillory S; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):E590-8. PubMed ID: 22146286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematics of a selectively constrained radiolucent anterior lumbar disc: comparisons to hybrid and circumferential fusion.
    Daftari TK; Chinthakunta SR; Ingalhalikar A; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Khalil S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Oct; 27(8):759-65. PubMed ID: 22748372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion.
    Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Moon SH; Kim HS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim BR; Sohn JS; Ko YN; Lee HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):1637-44. PubMed ID: 22089393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
    Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of an auxiliary facet system on intervertebral discs and adjacent facet joints.
    Charles YP; Lima LV; Persohn S; Rouch P; Steib JP; Skalli W
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 23988459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite element modeling of kinematic and load transmission alterations due to cervical intervertebral disc replacement.
    Womack W; Leahy PD; Patel VV; Puttlitz CM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 21785298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.
    Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Lee HM; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan; 56(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 25510758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.