These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22743124)
1. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral implant in Paprosky type III and IV femoral bone loss. Desai RR; Malkani AL; Hitt KD; Jaffe FF; Schurman JR; Shen J J Arthroplasty; 2012 Sep; 27(8):1492-1498.e1. PubMed ID: 22743124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes. Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: reliable choice for stem revision in Paprosky femoral type III defects. Chung LH; Wu PK; Chen CF; Chen WM; Chen TH; Liu CL Orthopedics; 2012 Jul; 35(7):e1017-21. PubMed ID: 22784893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations]. Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Nocon AA; Sculco TP; Sculco PK; Bostrom MP Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 30415464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Massive bone loss: allograft-prosthetic composites and beyond. Mayle RE; Paprosky WG J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):61-4. PubMed ID: 23118384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of modular cementless femoral stems in complex revision hip arthroplasty]. Zhang ZD; Zhuo Q; Zhang QM; Song JL; Yang Fan ; Chen JY Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2015 Mar; 28(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 25936185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does metaphyseal modularity in femoral revision stems have a role in treating bone defects less severe than IIIB? Clinical and radiological results of a series of 163 modular femoral stems. Soleilhavoup M; Villatte G; Cambier S; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Oct; 108(6):103353. PubMed ID: 35716986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications. Brown NM; Tetreault M; Cipriano CA; Della Valle CJ; Paprosky W; Sporer S Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):555-60. PubMed ID: 25053289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cement augmentation in the proximal femur to prevent stem subsidence in revision hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type II/IIIa defects. Tsai SW; Chen CF; Wu PK; Chen CM; Chen WM J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Jun; 81(6):571-576. PubMed ID: 29428321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up. Willems JH; Smulders K; Innocenti M; Bosker BH; van Hellemondt GG J Arthroplasty; 2022 Nov; 37(11):2239-2246. PubMed ID: 35537612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem. Rodriguez JA; Fada R; Murphy SB; Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat CS J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 18977637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High complication rate in reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIa acetabular defects using an oblong implant with modular side plates and a hook. Babis GC; Sakellariou VI; Chatziantoniou AN; Soucacos PN; Megas P J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Dec; 93(12):1592-6. PubMed ID: 22161919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation]. Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Proximal femur replacement in revision arthroplasty]. Hardes J; Budny T; Hauschild G; Balke M; Streitbürger A; Dieckmann R; Gosheger G; Ahrens H Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20183746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems. Fink B; Grossmann A Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Restoration of femoral bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty. Head WC; Wagner RA; Emerson RH; Malinin TI Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 8414435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Managing femoral bone loss in revision total hip replacement: fluted tapered modular stems. Cross MB; Paprosky WG Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):95-7. PubMed ID: 24187363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]