These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22743132)

  • 1. The effects of facilitation and competition on group foraging in patches.
    Laguë M; Tania N; Heath J; Edelstein-Keshet L
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Oct; 310():88-96. PubMed ID: 22743132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?
    O'Bryan LR; Lambeth SP; Schapiro SJ; Wilson ML
    Am J Primatol; 2020 Dec; 82(12):e23208. PubMed ID: 33118192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Depletion of deep marine food patches forces divers to give up early.
    Thums M; Bradshaw CJ; Sumner MD; Horsburgh JM; Hindell MA
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 22881702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maintaining social cohesion is a more important determinant of patch residence time than maximizing food intake rate in a group-living primate, Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata).
    Kazahari N
    Primates; 2014 Apr; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 24515524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does intraspecific competition among Allenby's gerbils lead to an Ideal Free Distribution across foraging patches?
    Makin DF; Kotler BP
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103922. PubMed ID: 31377380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal movement strategies for social foragers in unpredictable environments.
    Hancock PA; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Ecology; 2006 Aug; 87(8):2094-102. PubMed ID: 16937648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patch departure decisions by spice finches foraging singly or in groups.
    Livoreil B; Giraldeau La
    Anim Behav; 1997 Oct; 54(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 9344448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty drives deviations in normative foraging decision strategies.
    Kilpatrick ZP; Davidson JD; El Hady A
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Jul; 18(180):20210337. PubMed ID: 34255987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patch depletion, niche structuring and the evolution of co-operative foraging.
    van der Post DJ; Semmann D
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 11():335. PubMed ID: 22093680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.
    Marshall HH; Carter AJ; Ashford A; Rowcliffe JM; Cowlishaw G
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jul; 82(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 23650999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation.
    Bednekoff PA; Lima SL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Jul; 271(1547):1491-6. PubMed ID: 15306321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foraging rate versus sociality in the starling Sturnus vulgaris.
    Vásquez RA; Kacelnik A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Jan; 267(1439):157-64. PubMed ID: 10687821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental Evidence Shows the Importance of Behavioural Plasticity and Body Size under Competition in Waterfowl.
    Zhang Y; Prins HH; Versluijs M; Wessels R; Cao L; de Boer WF
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164606. PubMed ID: 27727315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feeding behavior and aggression in wild Siberut macaques (Macaca siberu) living under low predation risk.
    Richter C; Gras P; Hodges K; Ostner J; Schülke O
    Am J Primatol; 2015 Jul; 77(7):741-52. PubMed ID: 25736828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social foraging with partial (public) information.
    Mann O; Kiflawi M
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Oct; 359():112-9. PubMed ID: 24911779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Boldness predicts an individual's position along an exploration-exploitation foraging trade-off.
    Patrick SC; Pinaud D; Weimerskirch H
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Sep; 86(5):1257-1268. PubMed ID: 28646599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Macronutrient balancing affects patch departure by guerezas (Colobus guereza).
    Johnson CA; Raubenheimer D; Chapman CA; Tombak KJ; Reid AJ; Rothman JM
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Apr; 79(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 26479160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk.
    Eccard JA; Liesenjohann T; Dammhahn M
    Oecologia; 2020 Dec; 194(4):621-634. PubMed ID: 33141325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization, conflict, and nonoverlapping foraging ranges in ants.
    Adler FR; Gordon DM
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 14618533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What determines selection and abandonment of a foraging patch by wild giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in winter?
    Zhang Z; Zhan X; Yan L; Li M; Hu J; Wei F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 18982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.