262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22743264)
1. V-hilar suture renorrhaphy during robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: preliminary outcomes of a novel surgical technique.
Khalifeh A; Autorino R; Hillyer SP; Kaouk JH
Urology; 2012 Aug; 80(2):466-71. PubMed ID: 22743264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 252 robotic partial nephrectomies: evolving renorrhaphy technique and surgical outcomes at a single institution.
Kaouk JH; Hillyer SP; Autorino R; Haber GP; Gao T; Altunrende F; Khanna R; Spana G; White MA; Laydner H; Isac W; Stein RJ
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1338-44. PubMed ID: 22001098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for hilar tumours.
Abreu AL; Gill IS; Desai MM
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):948-54. PubMed ID: 21917096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes.
Benway BM; Wang AJ; Cabello JM; Bhayani SB
Eur Urol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):592-9. PubMed ID: 19144457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel robotic renorrhaphy technique for hilar tumours: 'V' hilar suture (VHS).
Hillyer S; Spana G; White MA; Autorino R; Laydner H; Khanna R; Stein RJ; Haber GP; Kaouk JH
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1572-7. PubMed ID: 22520108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hilar Parenchymal Oversew: a novel technique for robotic partial nephrectomy hilar tumor renorrhaphy.
Chavali JSS; Nelson R; Maurice MJ; Kara O; Mouracade P; Dagenais J; Reese J; Bayona P; Haber GP; Stein RJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):199. PubMed ID: 28379673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting renal function after open partial nephrectomy-a comparison of clampless and clamped warm ischemic technique.
Kopp RP; Mehrazin R; Palazzi K; Bazzi WM; Patterson AL; Derweesh IH
Urology; 2012 Oct; 80(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 22951008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zero ischemia robotic partial nephrectomy: sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique.
Rizkala ER; Khalifeh A; Autorino R; Samarasekera D; Laydner H; Kaouk JH
Urology; 2013 Jul; 82(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 23806396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolving renorrhaphy technique for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon series.
Wahafu W; Ma X; Li HZ; Ding Q; Wang BJ; Shi TP; Zheng T; Dong J; Cai W; Zhang X
Int J Urol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):865-73. PubMed ID: 24780100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions.
Simhan J; Smaldone MC; Tsai KJ; Li T; Reyes JM; Canter D; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Greenberg RE; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R
J Urol; 2012 Jun; 187(6):2000-4. PubMed ID: 22498208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm.
Tiu A; Kim KH; Shin TY; Han WK; Han SW; Rha KH
Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 23219087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar occlusion.
White WM; Goel RK; Haber GP; Kaouk JH
BJU Int; 2010 Jun; 105(11):1580-4. PubMed ID: 19930179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases.
Dulabon LM; Kaouk JH; Haber GP; Berkman DS; Rogers CG; Petros F; Bhayani SB; Stifelman MD
Eur Urol; 2011 Mar; 59(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 21144643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics.
Weizer AZ; Gilbert SM; Roberts WW; Hollenbeck BK; Wolf JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1273-8. PubMed ID: 18707711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different methods of hilar clamping during partial nephrectomy: Impact on renal function.
Lee JW; Kim H; Choo M; Park YH; Ku JH; Kim HH; Kwak C
Int J Urol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 24033600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis.
Panumatrassamee K; Autorino R; Laydner H; Hillyer S; Khalifeh A; Kassab A; Stein RJ; Haber GP; Kaouk JH
Int J Urol; 2013 May; 20(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 23126452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.
DeLong JM; Shapiro O; Moinzadeh A
Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5207-12. PubMed ID: 20566016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm.
Patel MN; Krane LS; Bhandari A; Laungani RG; Shrivastava A; Siddiqui SA; Menon M; Rogers CG
Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):310-6. PubMed ID: 19945213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy with controlled hypotensive anesthesia to avoid hilar clamping: feasibility, safety and perioperative functional outcomes.
Papalia R; Simone G; Ferriero M; Costantini M; Guaglianone S; Forastiere E; Gallucci M
J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1190-4. PubMed ID: 22335869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
