These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22744139)

  • 1. The effects of short-term computerized speech-in-noise training on postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Ingvalson EM; Lee B; Fiebig P; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 22744139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Sep; 11(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 17709574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
    Park E; Shipp DB; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM; Lin VY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):637-43. PubMed ID: 22212763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech performance and training effects in the cochlear implant elderly.
    Schumann A; Hast A; Hoppe U
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19 Suppl 1():45-48. PubMed ID: 25733367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.
    Oba SI; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 21389857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testing.
    Poissant SF; Bero EM; Busekroos L; Shao W
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 24518402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.
    Baudhuin J; Cadieux J; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Maxson JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):302-12. PubMed ID: 22533974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-Based Connected-Text Training of Speech-in-Noise Perception for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519843878. PubMed ID: 31010386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance Plateau in Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Cusumano C; Friedmann DR; Fang Y; Wang B; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):334-338. PubMed ID: 28166183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software.
    Smith L; Bartel L; Joglekar S; Chen J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e262-e267. PubMed ID: 28806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation.
    Fu QJ; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 15952053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    Sheffield SW; Haynes DS; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.