These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22744686)

  • 1. The feasibility of a centralized biogas plant treating the manure produced by an organized animal farmers union in Turkey.
    Dereli RK; Yangin-Gomec C; Ozabali A; Ozturk I
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 22744686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge to increase biogas production.
    Marañón E; Castrillón L; Quiroga G; Fernández-Nava Y; Gómez L; García MM
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1821-5. PubMed ID: 22743289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with rice straw: economic & energy feasibility.
    Silvestre G; Gómez MP; Pascual A; Ruiz B
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):745-55. PubMed ID: 23306251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-digestion of manure with grass silage and pulp and paper mill sludge using nutrient additions.
    Hagelqvist A; Granström K
    Environ Technol; 2016 Aug; 37(16):2113-23. PubMed ID: 26776302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of herbal-extraction residues with swine manure.
    Li Y; Yan XL; Fan JP; Zhu JH; Zhou WB
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jun; 102(11):6458-63. PubMed ID: 21507630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biogas and methane yield in response to co- and separate digestion of biomass wastes.
    Adelard L; Poulsen TG; Rakotoniaina V
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Jan; 33(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 25492719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Site-specific economic and ecological analysis of enhanced production, upgrade and feed-in of biomethane from organic wastes.
    Lindorfer J; Schwarz MM
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 23202576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Batch anaerobic co-digestion of Kimchi factory waste silage and swine manure under mesophilic conditions.
    Kafle GK; Kim SH; Sung KI
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Nov; 124():489-94. PubMed ID: 23021949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methane production in low-cost, unheated, plug-flow digesters treating swine manure and used cooking grease.
    Lansing S; Martin JF; Botero RB; da Silva TN; da Silva ED
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(12):4362-70. PubMed ID: 20153173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing the environmental impact of methane emissions from dairy farms by anaerobic digestion of cattle waste.
    Marañón E; Salter AM; Castrillón L; Heaven S; Fernández-Nava Y
    Waste Manag; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1745-51. PubMed ID: 21504844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste: Energy, economic and environmental effects.
    Hublin A; Schneider DR; Džodan J
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jul; 32(7):626-33. PubMed ID: 24963093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure.
    Ye J; Li D; Sun Y; Wang G; Yuan Z; Zhen F; Wang Y
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2653-8. PubMed ID: 23790673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energy balance, greenhouse gas emissions, and profitability of thermobarical pretreatment of cattle waste in anaerobic digestion.
    Budde J; Prochnow A; Plöchl M; Suárez Quiñones T; Heiermann M
    Waste Manag; 2016 Mar; 49():390-410. PubMed ID: 26709050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The anaerobic co-digestion of sheep bedding and ⩾ 50% cattle manure increases biogas production and improves biofertilizer quality.
    Cestonaro T; Costa MS; Costa LA; Rozatti MA; Pereira DC; Lorin HE; Carneiro LJ
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():612-8. PubMed ID: 26341827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifts of acidogenic bacterial group and biogas production by adding two industrial residues in anaerobic co-digestion with cattle manure.
    da Silva GH; Barros NO; Santana LAR; Carneiro JDC; Otenio MH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2021; 56(14):1503-1511. PubMed ID: 34903145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste.
    El-Mashad HM; Zhang R
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(11):4021-8. PubMed ID: 20137909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of increasing organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and cow manure mix.
    Comino E; Rosso M; Riggio V
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(9):3013-9. PubMed ID: 20053553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anaerobic pretreatment and increased solid destruction for vegetable solid waste codigested with cattle slurry.
    Mandachittibabu ; Saravanane R; Sivacoumar R
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2009 Jan; 51(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 21114156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production.
    Massé DI; Masse L; Xia Y; Gilbert Y
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E112-20. PubMed ID: 19855002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concepts and profitability of biogas production from landscape management grass.
    Blokhina YN; Prochnow A; Plöchl M; Luckhaus C; Heiermann M
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):2086-92. PubMed ID: 20801018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.