221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22745954)
1. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M; Cunningham J; Matsoso P; Nathanson CM; Olliaro P; Peeling RW; Ramsay A;
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 4(9 Suppl):S21-31. PubMed ID: 17034069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
Doyon F; Hill C
J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M; Cunningham J; Matsoso P; Nathanson CM; Olliaro P; Peeling RW; Ramsay A;
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S20-32. PubMed ID: 17366684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: diagnosing purple mange.
Collier J; Huebscher R
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Apr; 22(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 20409258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Importance of scientific research design to improve the quality of clinical study].
Wang J
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 1999 Jun; 22(6):325-6. PubMed ID: 11775817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Appropriate interpretation of laboratory tests for infectious diseases].
Baba H
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Feb; 65 Suppl 2 Pt. 1():151-4. PubMed ID: 17455608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 22745953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Drugs and diagnostic innovations to improve global health.
Peeling RW; Nwaka S
Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2011 Sep; 25(3):693-705, xi. PubMed ID: 21896368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. US $30 million dollars research effort to develop new tests for deadly infectious diseases.
Saudi Med J; 2003 Oct; 24(10):1156-7. PubMed ID: 15352299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A guide for diagnostic evaluations.
Peeling RW; Smith PG; Bossuyt PM
Nat Rev Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 4(12 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 17110921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified.
Vach W; Gerke O; Høilund-Carlsen PF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21995974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures].
Bossuyt PM; Lijmer JG; Mol BW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(43):2345-7. PubMed ID: 9864513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
Veziris N; Jarlier V
Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
Knol A
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(33):1608. PubMed ID: 10965371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
