These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2274615)

  • 41. Attention - brains at work!
    Tootell RB; Hadjikhani N
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Mar; 3(3):206-8. PubMed ID: 10700248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field.
    Petre KL; Hazel CA; Fine EM; Rubin GS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jan; 77(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 10654856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Hemispheric differences in event-related potentials to stroop stimuli. Attention and color-word processing.
    Aine CJ; Harter MR
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():154-6. PubMed ID: 6588822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distinguishing subcortical and cortical influences in visual attention. Subcortical attentional processing.
    Zackon DH; Casson EJ; Stelmach L; Faubert J; Racette L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 9040469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Visual half-field testing for defining cerebral hemisphere speech laterality.
    Säisä J; Silfvenius H; Christianson SA
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1990 Nov; 82(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 2126417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reaction times and evoked potentials as indicators of hemispheric differences for laterally presented name and physical matches.
    Ledlow A; Swanson JM; Kinsbourne M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Aug; 4(3):440-54. PubMed ID: 681891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: a critical review.
    Ehrlichman H; Weinberger A
    Psychol Bull; 1978 Sep; 85(5):1080-1101. PubMed ID: 704719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Directional scanning and cerebral asymmetries in processing visual stimuli.
    Aaron PG; Handley AC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Jun; 40(3):719-25. PubMed ID: 1178354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect).
    Heilman KM; Van Den Abell T
    Neurology; 1980 Mar; 30(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 7189037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Lateral eye movements and the recall of spatial information in a familiar, large-scale environment.
    Bruce PR; Herman JF; Stern J
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(4):505-8. PubMed ID: 7133389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
    Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Crossmodal spatial influences of touch on extrastriate visual areas take current gaze direction into account.
    Macaluso E; Frith CD; Driver J
    Neuron; 2002 May; 34(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 12062047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Some evidence for the hemispheric asymmetry model of lateral eye movements.
    Swinnen S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Feb; 58(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 6718204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Orienting attention within visual fields: how efficient is interhemispheric transfer?
    Hardyck C; Chiarello C; Dronkers NF; Simpson GV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Oct; 11(5):650-66. PubMed ID: 2932534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dominant direction of conjugate lateral eye movements and responsiveness to facial and verbal cues.
    Crouch WW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 1256972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres.
    Koivisto M
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Apr; 35(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 9106278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Visual field asymmetries in selective attention: evidence from a modified search paradigm.
    Michael GA; Ojéda N
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 16026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hemispheric preponderance in categorical and coordinate visual processes.
    Parrot M; Doyon B; Démonet JF; Cardebat D
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Oct; 37(11):1215-25. PubMed ID: 10530722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Velocity discrimination thresholds for flowfield motions with moving observers.
    von Grünau MW; Pilgrim K; Zhou R
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2453-64. PubMed ID: 17651779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.