208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22746353)
1. Patient device assessment evaluation of two insulin injection devices in a mixed cohort of insulin-treated patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Schipper C; Musholt P; Niemeyer M; Qvist M; Löffler A; Forst T; Pfützner A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Aug; 28(8):1297-303. PubMed ID: 22746353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and preference assessment of prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe with diabetes patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
Pfützner A; Bailey T; Campos C; Kahn D; Ambers E; Niemeyer M; Guerrero G; Klonoff D; Nayberg I
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 May; 29(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 23402225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usability and preference evaluation of a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.
Bailey T; Thurman J; Niemeyer M; Schmeisl G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Oct; 27(10):2043-52. PubMed ID: 21916529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability and preference assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe in people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.
Campos C; Lajara R; Deluzio T
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2012 Sep; 13(13):1837-46. PubMed ID: 22873943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.
Oyer D; Narendran P; Qvist M; Niemeyer M; Nadeau DA
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1259-69. PubMed ID: 21905942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment for ease of use and preference of a new prefilled insulin pen (FlexTouch Degludec U100/U200) versus the SoloSTAR insulin pen by patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals.
Pfützner A; Forst T; Niemeyer M; Bailey T
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2014 Sep; 11(9):1381-9. PubMed ID: 24921223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insulin pen needles: effects of extra-thin wall needle technology on preference, confidence, and other patient ratings.
Aronson R; Gibney MA; Oza K; Bérubé J; Kassler-Taub K; Hirsch L
Clin Ther; 2013 Jul; 35(7):923-933.e4. PubMed ID: 23790553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens.
Clark PE; Valentine V; Bodie JN; Sarwat S
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jul; 26(7):1745-53. PubMed ID: 20482243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intuitiveness, instruction time, and patient acceptance of a prefilled insulin delivery device and a reusable insulin delivery device in a randomized, open-label, crossover handling study in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Reimer T; Hohberg C; Pfützner AH; Jørgensen C; Jensen KH; Pfützner A
Clin Ther; 2008 Dec; 30(12):2252-62. PubMed ID: 19167585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Healthcare professional and patient assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus two widely available prefilled insulin pens for ease of use, teaching and learning.
Nadeau DA; Campos C; Niemeyer M; Bailey T
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Jan; 28(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 22114905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.
Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G
Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of patient preference for two insulin injection pen devices in relation to patient dexterity skills.
Pfützner A; Schipper C; Niemeyer M; Qvist M; Löffler A; Forst T; Musholt PB
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):910-6. PubMed ID: 22920818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient acceptance and reliability of new Humulin/Humalog 3.0 ml prefilled insulin pen in ten Croatian diabetes centres.
Sucic M; Galic E; Cabrijan T; Ivandic A; Petrusic A; Wyatt J; Mincheva N; Milicevic Z; Malone J
Med Sci Monit; 2002 Mar; 8(3):PI21-6. PubMed ID: 11884952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.
Summers KH; Szeinbach SL; Lenox SM
Clin Ther; 2004 Sep; 26(9):1498-505. PubMed ID: 15531012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized, cross-over comparison of preference between two reusable insulin pen devices in pen-naïve adults with diabetes.
Wong M; Abdulnabi R; Carey MA; Fu H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 May; 29(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 23438454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-assessment and objective determination of dexterity in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Pfützner A; Musholt PB; Schipper C; Niemeyer M; Qvist M; Schorsch A; Forst T
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Jan; 28(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 22087736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurses' perceptions and satisfaction with the use of insulin pen devices compared with insulin vial and syringes in an inpatient setting.
Shogbon AO; Ngo D; Jacob B; Kimble LP; Ryan G
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Nov; 16(11):742-6. PubMed ID: 25198537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of a new disposable insulin pen and injection habits of diabetes patients in everyday clinical practice].
Böhler S; Landgraf W; Schreiber SA
MMW Fortschr Med; 2010 Jan; 151 Suppl 4():179-87. PubMed ID: 21595146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm x 32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes.
Hirsch LJ; Gibney MA; Albanese J; Qu S; Kassler-Taub K; Klaff LJ; Bailey TS
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jun; 26(6):1531-41. PubMed ID: 20429832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative usability study of the dulaglutide single-use pen versus the insulin degludec FlexTouch
Asakura T; Suzuki S; Aranishi T; Cai Z
Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 29504812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
