95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22746984)
1. Imagery encoding and false recognition errors: exploring boundary conditions of imagery's enhancing effects.
Foley MA
Memory; 2012; 20(7):700-16. PubMed ID: 22746984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acts of generating and their sources: predicting the effects of imagery encoding on false recognition errors.
Foley MA; Cowan E; Schlemmer E; Belser-Ehrlich J
Memory; 2012; 20(4):384-99. PubMed ID: 22443412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imagery encoding and false recognition errors: Examining the role of imagery process and imagery content on source misattributions.
Foley MA; Foy J; Schlemmer E; Belser-Ehrlich J
Memory; 2010 Nov; 18(8):801-21. PubMed ID: 20924947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pictorial encoding effects and memory confusions in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm: evidence for the activation of spontaneous imagery.
Foley MA; Foy J
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):712-27. PubMed ID: 18720219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False item recognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Abe N; Fujii T; Nishio Y; Iizuka O; Kanno S; Kikuchi H; Takagi M; Hiraoka K; Yamasaki H; Choi H; Hirayama K; Shinohara M; Mori E
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1897-902. PubMed ID: 21419789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-induced priming impairs source monitoring accuracy in the DRM procedure.
Dewhurst SA; Knott LM; Howe ML
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21480753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is it all in the details? Description content and false recognition errors.
Bays RB; Foley MA; Cohen A
Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 31902019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imagery of errors in typing.
Rieger M; Martinez F; Wenke D
Cognition; 2011 Nov; 121(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 21821234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collaborative encoding and memory accuracy: examining the effects of interactive components of co-construction processes.
Foley MA; Fried AR; Cowan E; Bays RB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 24016139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive false memory: Imagining future scenarios increases false memories in the DRM paradigm.
Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; Grace L; van Esch L
Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1076-84. PubMed ID: 27173584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repetition and spacing effects on true and false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
Dubuisson JB; Fiori N; Nicolas S
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Oct; 53(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 22830573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of distinctive processing manipulations on older adults' false memory.
Butler KM; McDaniel MA; McCabe DP; Dornburg CC
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Mar; 17(2):129-59. PubMed ID: 19642045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False memory in schizophrenia patients with and without delusions.
Bhatt R; Laws KR; McKenna PJ
Psychiatry Res; 2010 Jul; 178(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 20466436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mood-congruent false memories persist over time.
Knott LM; Thorley C
Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(5):903-12. PubMed ID: 24294987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual differences in spatial mental imagery.
Borst G; Kosslyn SM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):2031-50. PubMed ID: 20521213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing the distinctiveness of visual imagery and motor imagery in a reach paradigm.
Gabbard C; Ammar D; Cordova A
Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 19116842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No effect of stress on false recognition.
Beato MS; Cadavid S; Pulido RF; Pinho MS
Psicothema; 2013 Feb; 25(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 23336539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
