These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22747638)
1. Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age. Villas Boas PJ; Spagnuolo RS; Kamegasawa A; Braz LG; Polachini do Valle A; Jorge EC; Yoo HH; Cataneo AJ; Corrêa I; Fukushima FB; do Nascimento P; Módolo NS; Teixeira MS; de Oliveira Vidal EI; Daher SR; El Dib R J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 22747638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping the Cochrane evidence for decision making in health care. El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):689-92. PubMed ID: 17683315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care. Afshari A Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Usefulness of Cochrane Collaboration for pediatric cardiology]. González-de Dios J; Balaguer-Santamaría A; Ochoa-Sangrador C Rev Esp Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):1093-106. PubMed ID: 16185620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of Cochrane Skin Group reviews for clinical practice. Davila-Seijo P; Batalla A; Garcia-Doval I Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2013 Oct; 104(8):679-84. PubMed ID: 23954044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment. de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of dementia and cognitive impairment: what can we learn from the Cochrane Library. Bereczki D; Szatmári S J Neurol Sci; 2009 Aug; 283(1-2):207-10. PubMed ID: 19268303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting 'number needed to treat' in meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study. Naing C; Aung K; Mak JW J Evid Based Med; 2012 Nov; 5(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 23557504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: what's there and what should be. Amato L; Davoli M; Vecchi S; Ali R; Farrell M; Faggiano F; Foxcroft D; Ling W; Minozzi S; Chengzheng Z Drug Alcohol Depend; 2011 Jan; 113(2-3):96-103. PubMed ID: 20832954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of the Cochrane Oral Health Group systematic reviews. Teich ST; Lang LA; Demko CA J Dent Educ; 2015 Jan; 79(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 25576547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evidence-based medicine. (Role of the Cochrane collaboration)]. Bereczki D Orv Hetil; 1999 Mar; 140(12):643-6. PubMed ID: 10217955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The practice of systematic reviews. XI. The Cochrane Library]. Boluyt N; Scholten RJ; Offringa M Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Dec; 147(52):2572-7. PubMed ID: 14723024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results. Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic reviews--triumph of form over substance? Thomas L; Wilson JA Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):492-5. PubMed ID: 17184452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evidence-based surgery is no passing fad. Johnson NP; Selman T; Zamora J; Khan KS Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):832-9. PubMed ID: 18245509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]