These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22748353)
1. Reproducibility of coronary optical coherence tomography for lumen and length measurements in humans (The CLI-VAR [Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-VARiability] study). Fedele S; Biondi-Zoccai G; Kwiatkowski P; Di Vito L; Occhipinti M; Cremonesi A; Albertucci M; Materia L; Paoletti G; Prati F Am J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 22748353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of serial optical coherence tomography measurements for lumen area and plaque components in humans (The CLI-VAR [Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto-variability] II study). Paoletti G; Marco V; Romagnoli E; Gatto L; Fedele S; Mangiameli A; Ramazzotti V; Castriota F; Di Vito L; Ricciardi A; Prati F Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 26585751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection. Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study. Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study. Prati F; Di Vito L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Occhipinti M; La Manna A; Tamburino C; Burzotta F; Trani C; Porto I; Ramazzotti V; Imola F; Manzoli A; Materia L; Cremonesi A; Albertucci M EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):823-9. PubMed ID: 23034247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Impact of Suboptimal Stenting and Residual Intrastent Plaque/Thrombus Protrusion in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The CLI-OPCI ACS Substudy (Centro per la Lotta Contro L'Infarto-Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome). Prati F; Romagnoli E; Gatto L; La Manna A; Burzotta F; Limbruno U; Versaci F; Fabbiocchi F; Di Giorgio A; Marco V; Ramazzotti V; Di Vito L; Trani C; Porto I; Boi A; Tavazzi L; Mintz GS Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 9(12):. PubMed ID: 27965297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Second-generation optical coherence tomography in clinical practice. High-speed data acquisition is highly reproducible in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Gonzalo N; Tearney GJ; Serruys PW; van Soest G; Okamura T; García-García HM; Jan van Geuns R; van der Ent M; Ligthart J; Bouma BE; Regar E Rev Esp Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):893-903. PubMed ID: 20738934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term consequences of optical coherence tomography findings during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro Per La Lotta Contro L'infarto - Optimization Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) LATE study. Prati F; Romagnoli E; La Manna A; Burzotta F; Gatto L; Marco V; Fineschi M; Fabbiocchi F; Versaci F; Trani C; Tamburino C; Alfonso F; Mintz GS EuroIntervention; 2018 Jul; 14(4):e443-e451. PubMed ID: 29633940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography. Ramesh S; Papayannis A; Abdel-karim AR; Banerjee S; Brilakis E J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 24(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 22388302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility and safety of the second-generation, frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT): a multicenter study. Yoon JH; Di Vito L; Moses JW; Fearon WF; Yeung AC; Zhang S; Bezerra HG; Costa MA; Jang IK J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 May; 24(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 22562913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection. Tanimoto S; Rodriguez-Granillo G; Barlis P; de Winter S; Bruining N; Hamers R; Knappen M; Verheye S; Serruys PW; Regar E Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug; 72(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 18324698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of coronary Fourier domain optical coherence tomography: quantitative analysis of in vivo stented coronary arteries using three different software packages. Okamura T; Gonzalo N; Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Serruys PW; Bruining N; de Winter S; Dijkstra J; Commossaris KH; van Geuns RJ; van Soest G; Ligthart J; Regar E EuroIntervention; 2010 Aug; 6(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 20884417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters. Zafar H; Ullah I; Dinneen K; Matiullah S; Hanley A; Leahy MJ; Sharif F J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24368093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel method to assess coronary artery bifurcations by OCT: cut-plane analysis for side-branch ostial assessment from a main-vessel pullback. Karanasos A; Tu S; van Ditzhuijzen NS; Ligthart JM; Witberg K; Van Mieghem N; van Geuns RJ; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Reiber JH; Regar E Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Feb; 16(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 25227268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A formula to calculate the contrast volume required for optimal imaging quality in optical coherence tomography with non-occlusive technique. Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Cortés C; Schincariol M; Jaguszewski M Cardiol J; 2018; 25(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 30246237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of contrast media and low-molecular-weight dextran for frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Ozaki Y; Kitabata H; Tsujioka H; Hosokawa S; Kashiwagi M; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Takarada S; Kubo T; Kimura K; Tanaka A; Hirata K; Mizukoshi M; Imanishi T; Akasaka T Circ J; 2012; 76(4):922-7. PubMed ID: 22301848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of a new generation intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging system with fast pullback. Nishi T; Kume T; Yamada R; Koto S; Sasahira Y; Okamoto H; Tamada T; Koyama T; Imai K; Neishi Y; Ughi GJ; Uemura S Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Feb; 101(3):520-527. PubMed ID: 36740230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Iodixanol and Ioxaglate for Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging. Christakopoulos GE; Kotsia AP; Christopoulos G; Abdullah SM; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 27(12):E287-90. PubMed ID: 26378414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]