These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22748557)

  • 1. Comment on "effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners".
    Ludlow JB
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4219-20; author reply 4221-4. PubMed ID: 22748557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Collaert B; Theodorakou C; Rogers J; Walker A; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
    Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone beam CT in dental practice.
    Dawood A; Patel S; Brown J
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jul; 207(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19590551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
    Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.
    De Vos W; Casselman J; Swennen GR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 38(6):609-25. PubMed ID: 19464146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone beam volumetric tomography vs. medical CT scanners.
    Winter AA; Pollack AS; Frommer HH; Koenig L
    N Y State Dent J; 2005; 71(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 16146304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography.
    Patel S
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):463-75. PubMed ID: 19298576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Loubele M; Jacobs R; Maes F; Denis K; White S; Coudyzer W; Lambrichts I; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):309-18. PubMed ID: 18757715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cone beam computed tomography: is more also better?].
    van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2016 Apr; 123(4):189-98. PubMed ID: 27073809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance.
    Braak SJ; van Strijen MJ; van Es HW; Nievelstein RA; van Heesewijk JP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 21463755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT].
    Coppenrath E; Draenert F; Lechel U; Veit R; Meindl T; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 18543414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality control and patient dosimetry in dental cone beam CT.
    Vassileva J; Stoyanov D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):310-2. PubMed ID: 20457665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding and communicating radiation dose and risk from cone beam computed tomography in dentistry.
    Aanenson JW; Till JE; Grogan HA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 29724555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the effective radiation dose imparted to patients by intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.
    Lange J; Karellas A; Street J; Eck JC; Lapinsky A; Connolly PJ; Dipaola CP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E306-12. PubMed ID: 23238490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Sukovic P
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 72(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16480609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of a Commercial Lead Apron on Patient Skin Dose Delivered During Oral and Maxillofacial Examinations under Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
    Schulze RKW; Sazgar M; Karle H; de Las Heras Gala H
    Health Phys; 2017 Aug; 113(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 28658058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.