These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22748758)

  • 1. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
    De Groote SL; Raszewski R
    Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of the Hirsch index in benchmarking hepatic surgery research.
    Cucchetti A; Mazzotti F; Pellegrini S; Cescon M; Maroni L; Ercolani G; Pinna AD
    Am J Surg; 2013 Oct; 206(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 23806828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-rater reliability of h-index scores calculated by Web of Science and Scopus for clinical epidemiology scientists.
    Walker B; Alavifard S; Roberts S; Lanes A; Ramsay T; Boet S
    Health Info Libr J; 2016 Jun; 33(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 27168256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ranking hepatologists: which Hirsch's h-index to prevent the "e-crise de foi-e"?
    Poynard T; Thabut D; Jabre P; Munteanu M; Ratziu V; Benhamou Y; Deckmyn O
    Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2011 May; 35(5):375-86. PubMed ID: 21482219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].
    Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E
    Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Anker MS; Hadzibegovic S; Lena A; Haverkamp W
    ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history.
    Baneyx A
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):363-71. PubMed ID: 19043670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.
    Freeman MK; Lauderdale SA; Kendrach MG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Mar; 43(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 19261965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
    Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: a province-wide study.
    Sharma B; Boet S; Grantcharov T; Shin E; Barrowman NJ; Bould MD
    Surgery; 2013 Apr; 153(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23465942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics.
    Powell KR; Peterson SR
    Nurs Outlook; 2017; 65(5):572-578. PubMed ID: 28377037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between h-index measures from different bibliographic sources and search engines.
    Barreto ML; Aragão E; Sousa LE; Santana TM; Barata RB
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Apr; 47(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24037349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bibliometric indicators: a snapshot of the scientific productivity of leading European PRM researchers.
    Franchignoni F; Muñoz Lasa S; Ozçakar L; Ottonello M
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Sep; 47(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 21946402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Part II: Should the h-index be modified? An analysis of the m-quotient, contemporary h-index, authorship value, and impact factor.
    Khan NR; Thompson CJ; Taylor DR; Gabrick KS; Choudhri AF; Boop FR; Klimo P
    World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):766-74. PubMed ID: 23886815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Capturing citation activity in three health sciences departments: a comparison study of Scopus and Web of Science.
    Sarkozy A; Slyman A; Wu W
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2015; 34(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 25927511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Productivity and visibility of Cuban neuroscientists: bibliometric study of the period 2001-2005].
    Dorta-Contreras AJ; Arencibia-Jorge R; Martí-Lahera Y; Araujo-Ruiz JA
    Rev Neurol; 2008 Oct 1-15; 47(7):355-60. PubMed ID: 18841546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama].
    La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A
    Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.
    Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
    Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the impact of paediatric oncology publications using three citation databases.
    Arora RS; Eden TO
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2011 Jan; 56(1):152-3. PubMed ID: 20922764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.