164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22748930)
1. Strength of ulnar fixation in ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of traditional bone tunnels to the tension-slide technique.
Jackson A; Maerz T; Koueiter DM; Andrecovich CJ; Baker KC; Anderson K
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Dec; 21(12):1674-9. PubMed ID: 22748930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.
Lynch JL; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 23636555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation.
Morgan RJ; Starman JS; Habet NA; Peindl RD; Bankston LS; D'Alessandro DD; Connor PM; Fleischli JE
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jul; 38(7):1448-55. PubMed ID: 20442324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of a new reconstruction technique of the ulnar collateral ligament in the elbow with modified bone tunnel placement and interference screw fixation.
Seiber KS; Savoie FH; McGarry MH; Gupta R; Lee TQ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jan; 25(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 19837496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical comparison of 2 ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques.
Large TM; Coley ER; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 17276221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.
Jackson TJ; Adamson GJ; Peterson A; Patton J; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 23548807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Chang ES; Le AH; Looney AM; Colantonio DF; Roach WB; Helgeson MD; Clark DM; Fredericks DR; Nagda SH
Am J Sports Med; 2022 Apr; 50(5):1375-1381. PubMed ID: 34889687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of the docking plus ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique compared with the docking technique.
McGraw MA; Kremchek TE; Hooks TR; Papangelou C
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 23193145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
Dutton PH; Banffy MB; Nelson TJ; Metzger MF
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3491-3497. PubMed ID: 31647881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique.
Lee GH; Limpisvasti O; Park MC; McGarry MH; Yocum LA; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):575-80. PubMed ID: 20028848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of a new ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique with interference screw fixation.
Ahmad CS; Lee TQ; ElAttrache NS
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 12750123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow.
Paletta GA; Klepps SJ; Difelice GS; Allen T; Brodt MD; Burns ME; Silva MJ; Wright RW
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1599-603. PubMed ID: 16861581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
Chronister JE; Morris RP; Andersen CR; Buford WL; Bennett JM; Mehlhoff TL
J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):2033-40. PubMed ID: 25194771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of the docking technique with and without humeral bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.
Hurbanek JG; Anderson K; Crabtree S; Karnes GJ
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):526-33. PubMed ID: 19168809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The GraftLink ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison with the docking technique in both kinematics and failure tests.
Lynch JL; Pifer MA; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Oct; 41(10):2278-87. PubMed ID: 23940203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.
Itami Y; Mihata T; McGarry MH; Lin CC; Patel NA; Kantor AH; Hasegawa A; Neo M; Lee TQ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 33276162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The circumferential graft technique for treatment of multidirectional elbow instability: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
Hackl M; Heinze N; Wegmann K; Lappen S; Leschinger T; Burkhart KJ; Scaal M; Müller LP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jan; 25(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 26344872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Bracing Versus Modified Jobe Reconstruction.
Dugas JR; Walters BL; Beason DP; Fleisig GS; Chronister JE
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Mar; 44(3):735-41. PubMed ID: 26717972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isometric placement of lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions: a biomechanical study.
Goren D; Budoff JE; Hipp JA
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 19797616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of a less invasive procedure for reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow.
Hechtman KS; Tjin-A-Tsoi EW; Zvijac JE; Uribe JW; Latta LL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(5):620-4. PubMed ID: 9784806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
