283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22748954)
1. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery.
Ghomi A; Kramer C; Askari R; Chavan NR; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blinded measure of Trendelenburg angle in pelvic robotic surgery.
Gould C; Cull T; Wu YX; Osmundsen B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 22621993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy.
Awad H; Santilli S; Ohr M; Roth A; Yan W; Fernandez S; Roth S; Patel V
Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 19608821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures.
Klauschie J; Wechter ME; Jacob K; Zanagnolo V; Montero R; Magrina J; Kho R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):504-7. PubMed ID: 20471916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraocular pressure and steep Trendelenburg during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: is there a risk?
Borahay MA; Patel PR; Walsh TM; Tarnal V; Koutrouvelis A; Vizzeri G; Jennings K; Jerig S; Kilic GS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 23941744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic assisted prostatic surgery in the Trendelenburg position does not impair cerebral oxygenation measured using two different monitors: A clinical observational study.
Closhen D; Treiber AH; Berres M; Sebastiani A; Werner C; Engelhard K; Schramm P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 24225725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Steep Trendelenburg position during robotic sacrocolpopexy and heart rate variability.
Lowenstein L; Mustafa M; Burke YZ; Mustafa S; Segal D; Weissman A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():66-9. PubMed ID: 24841646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
George A; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-operative alopecia after robotic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position: a restated observation of pressure alopecia.
Gollapalli L; Papapetrou P; Gupta D; Fuleihan SF
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 22(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 24649795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Paraiso MF
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
