117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22748955)
1. Three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with vaginoscopic hysteroscopy for evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients with recurrent implantation failure in in vitro fertilization cycles.
Negm SM; Kamel RA; Abuhamila FA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 22748955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic accuracy of two- vs three-dimensional sonohysterography for evaluation of the uterine cavity in the reproductive age.
El-Sherbiny W; El-Mazny A; Abou-Salem N; Mostafa WS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 25195158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of 3-dimensional sonohysterography in infertility work-up.
El-Sherbiny W; Nasr AS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 20970387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of 3-dimensional sonohysterography for detection of intrauterine lesions in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Abou-Salem N; Elmazny A; El-Sherbiny W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 20226408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional sonohysterography compared with office hysteroscopy and its interrater/intrarater agreement in uterine cavity assessment after hysteroscopic metroplasty.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Kudla M; Pitynski K; Banas T; Jach R; Knafel A
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1392-9. PubMed ID: 24581576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D sonohysterography vs hysteroscopy: a cross-sectional study for the evaluation of endouterine diseases.
Laganà AS; Ciancimino L; Mancuso A; Chiofalo B; Rizzo P; Triolo O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 25022557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonohysterography as a first-line evaluation for uterine abnormalities in women with recurrent failed in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.
Shokeir T; Abdelshaheed M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1321-2. PubMed ID: 18394617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of sonohysterography in infertile patient work-up: a comparison with transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy.
Ragni G; Diaferia D; Vegetti W; Colombo M; Arnoldi M; Crosignani PG
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 15711083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Banas T; Knafel A; Miedzyblocki M; Basta A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Mar; 37(3):178-86. PubMed ID: 21314802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Infertility in women: combined sonohysterography and hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity.
De Felice C; Porfiri LM; Savelli S; Alfano G; Pace S; Manganaro L; Vestri AR; Drudi FM
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19197821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should diagnostic hysteroscopy be performed before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer?
Surrey ES
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 22935306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Which is the method of choice for evaluating uterine cavity in infertility workup?].
Ait Benkaddour Y; Gervaise A; Fernandez H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Dec; 39(8):606-13. PubMed ID: 20870363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri.
Ludwin A; Pityński K; Ludwin I; Banas T; Knafel A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23312248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal sonohysterographic evaluation of uterine malformations.
Valenzano MM; Mistrangelo E; Lijoi D; Fortunato T; Lantieri PB; Risso D; Costantini S; Ragni N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Feb; 124(2):246-9. PubMed ID: 16129545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal.
Saravelos SH; Cocksedge KA; Li TC
Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(5):415-29. PubMed ID: 18539641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical value of real time 3D sonohysterography and 2D sonohysterography in comparison to hysteroscopy with subsequent histopathological examination in perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Kowalczyk D; Guzikowski W; Więcek J; Sioma-Markowska U
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2012; 33(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 22592204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two- and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions.
Sylvestre C; Child TJ; Tulandi T; Tan SL
Fertil Steril; 2003 May; 79(5):1222-5. PubMed ID: 12738522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of hysterosalpingography, hysterosonography and hysteroscopy in evaluation of the uterine cavity in patients with recurrent pregnancy losses.
Guimarães Filho HA; Mattar R; Pires CR; Araujo Júnior E; Moron AF; Nardozza LM
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 274(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 16819615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of vaginal misoprostol and rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in vaginoscopic diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy in primarily infertile women: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Hassa H; Aydin Y; Oge T; Cicek K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 23850898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper genital-tract screening with hysterosonography in patients receiving donated oocytes.
Lindheim SR; Sauer MV
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Jan; 60(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 9506414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
