These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22749109)

  • 1. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
    Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
    Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
    Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses.
    Cho N; Moon WK; Kim HY; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions.
    Lu R; Xiao Y; Liu M; Shi D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 24658946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
    Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
    Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
    Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
    Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
    Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations of solid breast lesions by sonoelastography.
    Yerli H; Yilmaz T; Kaskati T; Gulay H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Feb; 30(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 21266555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
    Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience.
    Parajuly SS; Lan PY; Yun MB; Gang YZ; Hua Z
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1447-52. PubMed ID: 22799346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic Elastography Research Based on a Multicenter Study: Adding Strain Ratio after 5-Point Scoring Evaluation or Not.
    Mu WJ; Zhong WJ; Yao JY; Li LJ; Peng YL; Wang Y; Liu LS; Xiao Y; Liu SJ; Wu CJ; Jiang YX; Parajuly SS; Xu P; Hao Y; Li J; Luo BM; Zhi H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148330. PubMed ID: 26863208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the SR
    Moon JH; Koh SH; Park SY; Hwang JY; Woo JY
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 29726693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.