312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22749109)
21. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of elastographic and B-mode features at sonoelastography for breast tumor classification.
Moon WK; Huang CS; Shen WC; Takada E; Chang RF; Joe J; Nakajima M; Kobayashi M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1794-802. PubMed ID: 19767139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions.
Li Z; Sun J; Zhang J; Hu D; Wang Q; Peng K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 24315390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results.
Jung HJ; Hahn SY; Choi HY; Park SH; Park HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 22298871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid lesions: calculation of the strain ratio on thyroid sonoelastography.
Xing P; Wu L; Zhang C; Li S; Liu C; Wu C
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 May; 30(5):663-9. PubMed ID: 21527614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contribution of Sonoelastography to Diagnosis in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Yıldız MS; Goya C; Adin ME
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jul; 39(7):1395-1403. PubMed ID: 32083349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic performance of qualitative shear-wave elastography according to different color map opacities for breast masses.
Kim H; Youk JH; Gweon HM; Kim JA; Son EJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e326-31. PubMed ID: 23545451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lesion edge preserved direct average strain estimation for ultrasound elasticity imaging.
Hussain MA; Alam F; Rupa SA; Awwal R; Lee SY; Hasan MK
Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 23806339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic performance of real-time strain sonoelastography in BI-RADS 4 and 5 breast masses.
Ozsoy A; Acar D; Barca AN; Aktas H; Araz L; Ozkaraoglu O; Yuksel E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Sep; 97(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 27211021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonoelastography in the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Cancer Compared to Histopathology as a Gold Standard.
Rehman H; Raza S; Aziz S; Ahmad AM; Tahir S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 May; 27(5):267-270. PubMed ID: 28599685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implementation of Elastography Score and Strain Ratio in Combination with B-Mode Ultrasound Avoids Unnecessary Biopsies of Breast Lesions.
Bojanic K; Katavic N; Smolic M; Peric M; Kralik K; Sikora M; Vidačić K; Pacovski M; Stimac D; Ivanac G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):804-816. PubMed ID: 28094066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting prognostic factors of breast cancer using shear wave elastography.
Choi WJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 24268451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
