421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22749295)
1. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Cleland JA; Whitman JM; Houser JL; Wainner RS; Childs JD
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):921-31. PubMed ID: 22749295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Cleland JA; Fritz JM; Whitman JM; Palmer JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 16508559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity.
Tomkins CC; Battié MC; Hu R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1896-901. PubMed ID: 17762299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.
Farasyn A; Meeusen R
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16934729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.
Bendebba M; Dizerega GS; Long DM
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):118-32. PubMed ID: 17197345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain.
Cleland JA; Childs JD; Whitman JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jan; 89(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 18164333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A non-surgical approach to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study.
Murphy DR; Hurwitz EL; Gregory AA; Clary R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Feb; 7():16. PubMed ID: 16504078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis: results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis.
Atlas SJ; Deyo RA; van den Ancker M; Singer DE; Keller RB; Patrick DL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1869-76. PubMed ID: 12923478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical impairment index: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with acute low back pain.
Fritz JM; Piva SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1189-94. PubMed ID: 12782991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.
Mousavi SJ; Parnianpour M; Mehdian H; Montazeri A; Mobini B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):E454-9. PubMed ID: 16778675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain.
Frost H; Lamb SE; Stewart-Brown S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 18824951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.
Holm I; Friis A; Storheim K; Brox JI
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 12698128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial.
Whitman JM; Flynn TW; Childs JD; Wainner RS; Gill HE; Ryder MG; Garber MB; Bennett AC; Fritz JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):2541-9. PubMed ID: 17047542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties in chronic neck pain and C1-2 fusion patients.
Bremerich FH; Grob D; Dvorak J; Mannion AF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):1018-27. PubMed ID: 18427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.
Melikoglu MA; Kocabas H; Sezer I; Bilgilisoy M; Tuncer T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):E219-24. PubMed ID: 19282728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]